Canteen Vending Machine Overcharge Settlement
$30–$360
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was November 14, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Compass Group USA, Inc. (Canteen) allegedly charged consumers more than the displayed price for items purchased from certain vending machines when customers used credit, debit, or prepaid cards, without disclosing the extra card-use charges to consumers.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who made one or more purchases from a Canteen "Subject Vending Machine" (vending machines that provided both cash and card payment options and charged more for card purchases) using a credit, debit, or prepaid card in the United States between 2014 and July 9, 2025. Excluded are vending machines that had a cash discount sticker or digital shopping cart displaying both prices at the time of purchase.
Who is in the class
You are included in this settlement as a member of the Class if you (1) made one or more purchase from a "Subject Vending Machine" (2) with a credit, debit or prepaid card (3) in the United States (4) between 2014 and July 9, 2025.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a claim form by November 14, 2025. The page does not specify what information or proof is required to file a claim. A list of locations with affected vending machines is available on the settlement website.
Common questions
- How much does the Canteen Vending Machine Overcharge Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: $30–$360. The total settlement fund is $6.9M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Canteen Vending Machine Overcharge Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was November 14, 2025. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Canteen Vending Machine Overcharge Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at vendingmachinesettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Canteen Vending Machine Overcharge Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for January 9, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Andres Borrero(Consol Plaintiff)
- Brian Baldwin(Consol Plaintiff)
- Sean Madelmayer(Consol Plaintiff)
- Francis Jaye(Consol Plaintiff)
- James Jilek
- Virginia Carter
- George Moore
Defendants
- Does(Consol Defendant)
- Compass Group USA, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Mike AriasArias Sanguinetti Wang & Team LLP
- Kevin P. GreenGoldenberg Heller & Antognoli P.C.
- Robert Merrill PartainARIAS SANGUINETTI LLP
- Kimberly Slaven-HauthZEBERSKY PAYNE LLP
- Edward H. ZeberskyZEBERSKY PAYNE LLP
- Mark Dale Chappell , SrChappell Smith and Arden
- Graham Lee NewmanChappell, Chappell & Newman, Attorneys, LLC
- Ruth A. SheehanRhine Law Firm, PC
- John BrunoBruno Law Firm
- Michel M. AriasArias Sanguinetti Wang & Team LLP
- Daniel Scott Levy
- Richard S. Cornfeld
- Michael Anthony JenkinsMichael Anthony Jenkins
- Martin A. RameyCR Legal Team
- Joel R. RhineRhine Law Firm, PC
- Elise R SanguinettiArias Sanguinetti Wang and Torrijos LLP
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.
…moreUp to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.
…moreEqual payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.
…moreYour payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
…morePro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted