CClaimWatch
Claims closedemployment

Christopher v. Box, Inc. – Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement

Estimated settlement payment based on the number of applicable weeks employed as a Non-Exempt Employee or Outbound Business Representative during the relevant settlement period. Half will be subject to payroll tax deductions; the other half treated as non-wage income without withholdings (reported on Form 1099).

This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was May 11, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →

What happened

Box allegedly failed to properly include the value of Restricted Stock Units in the regular rate of pay when calculating overtime payments for non-exempt employees and Outbound Business Representatives. Box denies the allegations and maintains it complied with all applicable wage and hour laws. The parties agree there is a good faith dispute over whether Box properly calculated the regular rate of pay and paid all hours worked.

Do you qualify?

Current or former non-exempt employees (excluding Outbound Business Representatives) or Outbound Business Representatives who worked for Box during the relevant periods: April 1, 2019 to May 15, 2025 in New York or New Jersey; April 1, 2021 to May 15, 2025 in California; or April 1, 2022 to May 15, 2025 anywhere else in the United States.

How to file

Complete and submit the Consent to Join Settlement as a Plaintiff, Release, and Claim Form by May 11, 2026. Upon submission, you will receive your estimated settlement payment in exchange for releasing claims against Box related to failure to include Restricted Stock Unit value in regular rate of pay calculations.

Common questions

How much does the Christopher v. Box, Inc. – Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement pay?
Estimated payout: Estimated settlement payment based on the number of applicable weeks employed as a Non-Exempt Employee or Outbound Business Representative during the relevant settlement period. Half will be subject to payroll tax deductions; the other half treated as non-wage income without withholdings (reported on Form 1099).. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
What is the claim deadline for the Christopher v. Box, Inc. – Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement?
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was May 11, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
Is the Christopher v. Box, Inc. – Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement notice real, or a scam?
Claims are filed at boxincsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
When will payments from the Christopher v. Box, Inc. – Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement be sent?
Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More employment settlements

View all →
September 7, 2026employment

Hill v. BrandSafway Services - Employment Application Settlement

BrandSafway Services and related companies allegedly failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information in their job postings for open positions in Washington. Defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.

Up to $1,632.11

September 16, 2026employment

Perry v. Alatrade Foods - WARN Act Settlement

Alatrade Foods terminated employees at its Phenix City, Alabama facility due to a mass layoff or plant closing between February and August 2025. The plaintiff alleges the company violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide the required 60 days' advance notice. Alatrade denies all allegations and claims affirmative defenses.

Back pay at 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; amount depends on individual wages earned during the termination period

November 2, 2026No proof neededemployment

Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement

Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.

From $685.87

Deadline TBDemployment

Garner v. Amazon Retail LLC Settlement

Amazon Retail LLC allegedly violated Washington State wage and hour laws by failing to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods and pay all owed wages. The defendant has denied these allegations.