Common Ground Healthcare Cost-Sharing Reductions Class Action
Last verified September 18, 2026Source: jndHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The United States is defending against a class action lawsuit regarding cost-sharing reductions (CSRs). Health insurance cooperative members in the 2017, 2018, and 2019 subclasses alleged claims against the federal government related to healthcare cost-sharing reduction payments.
Do you qualify?
Members of the 2017 CSR Subclass, 2018 CSR Subclass, and/or 2019 CSR Subclass preliminarily certified by the United States Court of Federal Claims in the Common Ground Healthcare Cooperative v. United States litigation.
How to file
Class members who have not opted out of the settlement classes may receive settlement payments without taking action. Those who wish to opt out could have submitted withdrawal forms by October 14, 2025. Contact the settlement administrator at 1-833-894-4523, info@CSRClassAction.com, or by mail for additional information.
Common questions
- Is the Common Ground Healthcare Cost-Sharing Reductions Class Action notice real, or a scam?
- JND Class Action Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at csrclassaction.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Common Ground Healthcare Cost-Sharing Reductions Class Action be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for November 6, 2025; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Counsel for plaintiffs
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
- The settlement in Greenland is quiet. But what happens if the Americans want to revive the military base?Politiken.dk · September 22, 2026
- Trump slams US media's lawsuitBiztoc.com · September 21, 2026
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more