CClaimWatch
Claims closedfinance

Daugherty v. Sarasota Memorial Health Care System Settlement

Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →

What happened

Sarasota Memorial Health Care System contacted patients regarding past-due emergency medical debt that may have exceeded the amount covered under Florida's PIP (Personal Injury Protection) coverage limitations. This class action settlement addresses the collection practices related to such debt.

Do you qualify?

All patients/consumers residing in the State of Florida who were contacted at least once by Sarasota Memorial Health Care System regarding past-due emergency medical debt between June 7, 2017 and May 6, 2026.

How to file

Information about how to file a claim, what proof is needed, and the claim deadline are not provided on this page excerpt. Please visit the full settlement website for claim filing instructions.

Common questions

Is the Daugherty v. Sarasota Memorial Health Care System Settlement notice real, or a scam?
Atticus Administration LLC is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at fldaughertyclasssettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
When will payments from the Daugherty v. Sarasota Memorial Health Care System Settlement be sent?
Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for May 6, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.

Who's involved

Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More finance settlements

View all →
September 17, 2026finance

Patton v Trinity Settlement

Trinity Operating allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to owners for oil and gas production proceeds from Oklahoma wells under the Purchaser's Royalty Status Act. Trinity denies all wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and uncertainty.

…more

Distribution will be made pursuant to the Allocation Methodology as outlined in the Settlement Agreement; amount depends on individual claim details

November 5, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Schnucks Markets Rewards Points Sales Tax Settlement

Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full price of purchases before applying loyalty rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price after points were redeemed. The lawsuit claimed Schnucks illegally collected excess sales tax and failed to properly inform customers about this practice.

…more

Up to $7

November 24, 2026finance

Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement

The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.

Up to $80

February 10, 2027finance

Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement

Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging different surcharges based on the network used to process transactions. This prevented cardholders from getting lower fees when using less-expensive networks, causing them to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.

…more

Distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees, litigation costs, expenses, notice and administration costs, and service awards.