Multnomah County Tax Foreclosure Settlement
Surplus proceeds from the sale of tax-foreclosed properties that exceeded unpaid taxes, fees, and costs
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 13, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Multnomah County allegedly violated plaintiffs' rights by failing to provide proceeds from sales of tax-foreclosed properties that exceeded unpaid taxes and fees, in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court's Tyler v. Hennepin County decision. Multnomah County denies wrongdoing but has agreed to settle to avoid costly litigation.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who held or is the heir to a person or entity that held an ownership interest in or valid lien on real property foreclosed and sold in Multnomah County between October 12, 2017 and June 25, 2025 for nonpayment of real property taxes.
How to file
Submit a completed claim form by Friday, March 13, 2026, either online at the settlement website or by mail to Lynch v. Multnomah County, c/o Kroll Settlement Administration, PO Box 225391, New York, NY 10150-5391. You must be a member of the Settlement Class or heir to qualify.
Common questions
- How much does the Multnomah County Tax Foreclosure Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Surplus proceeds from the sale of tax-foreclosed properties that exceeded unpaid taxes, fees, and costs. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Multnomah County Tax Foreclosure Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 13, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Multnomah County Tax Foreclosure Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Kroll Settlement Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at multnomahtaxforeclosuresettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Multnomah County Tax Foreclosure Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for November 10, 2025; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Brooke Oberson
- Sabrina Boyles
- Gerald Andrus
- Dena Brown
- Linda Eden
- Shaughn Voepel
- Mark Lautenschlager
- Joyce Epperly
+ 15 more
Defendants
- Tillamook County
- Polk County
- Douglas County
- Deschutes County
- Benton County
- Lincoln County
- Coos County
- Linn County
+ 6 more
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Nathan J. FinkFink Bressack PLLC
- Michael D. HanifyPreti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios, LLP
- Kat J MailPreti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios, PLLP
- Shana SolomonPreti Flaherty
- Joseph C. KohnKohn, Swift & Graf, P.C.
- Elizabeth F. QuinbyPreti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios, LLP
- Zahra DeanKohn, Swift & Graf, P.C.
- Gregory Paul HanselPreti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios, LLP
- Elias KohnElias A Kohn PLLC
- Nadia H. DahabSugerman Dahab
- David F. SugermanSugerman Dahab
Counsel for defendants
- Michael H. McGeanForeman Sturm & Thede LLP
- Brian L. GingerichForeman Sturm & Thede LLP
- Emily D VarioLane County Office of County Counsel
- Christina L. Beatty-WaltersOregon Department of Justice
- William S. T. WoodSchwabe Williamson & Wyatt
- Thomas M. ChristSussman Shank, LLP
- Deanna J. ChangOregon Department of Justice
- Carla ScottOregon Department of Justice
- Kyle A. SturmForeman Sturm & Thede LLP
- Christian F. BoenischYamhill County, Office of County Counsel
- Mallory R. BeebeLane County Office of Legal Counsel
- Erin Pettigrew
- B. Andrew JonesMultnomah County Attorneys Office
- Carlos A. RaschMultnomah County Attorney's Office
- Andrew T. WeinerMultnomah County Attorney's Office
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more