Pizl v. Dependable Staffing Agency Wage Disclosure Settlement
Each Settlement Class Member who submits a valid and timely Claim Form and W9 will receive a pro rata share of at least $58,000 class fund divided by the number of Settlement Class Members.
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was May 16, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Dependable Staffing allegedly violated Washington law (RCW 49.58.110) by failing to include wage scale or salary range information on a Front Desk/Receptionist job posting on its website between January 1 and December 31, 2023. The company is settling the case for $115,000.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who applied for a Front Desk/Receptionist position with Dependable Staffing in response to a job posting on its website or other media between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, where the job posting did not disclose the wage scale or salary range.
How to file
Submit a timely and valid Claim Form and W9 to receive a settlement payment. The claim deadline expired on May 16, 2025, and no new claims are being accepted.
Common questions
- How much does the Pizl v. Dependable Staffing Agency Wage Disclosure Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Each Settlement Class Member who submits a valid and timely Claim Form and W9 will receive a pro rata share of at least $58,000 class fund divided by the number of Settlement Class Members.. The total settlement fund is $115,000. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Pizl v. Dependable Staffing Agency Wage Disclosure Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was May 16, 2025. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Pizl v. Dependable Staffing Agency Wage Disclosure Settlement?
- Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
- Is the Pizl v. Dependable Staffing Agency Wage Disclosure Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Dependable Staffing Settlement Administrator is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at dependablestaffingsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Pizl v. Dependable Staffing Agency Wage Disclosure Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Hill v. BrandSafway Services - Employment Application Settlement
BrandSafway Services and related companies allegedly failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information in their job postings for open positions in Washington. Defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.
Up to $1,632.11
Perry v. Alatrade Foods - WARN Act Settlement
Alatrade Foods terminated employees at its Phenix City, Alabama facility due to a mass layoff or plant closing between February and August 2025. The plaintiff alleges the company violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide the required 60 days' advance notice. Alatrade denies all allegations and claims affirmative defenses.
Back pay at 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; amount depends on individual wages earned during the termination period
Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement
Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.
From $685.87
Garner v. Amazon Retail LLC Settlement
Amazon Retail LLC allegedly violated Washington State wage and hour laws by failing to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods and pay all owed wages. The defendant has denied these allegations.