Pizl v. Dependable Staffing Agency Wage Disclosure Settlement
Each Settlement Class Member who submits a valid and timely Claim Form and W9 will receive a pro rata share of at least $58,000 class fund divided by the number of Settlement Class Members.
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was May 16, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Dependable Staffing allegedly violated Washington law (RCW 49.58.110) by failing to include wage scale or salary range information on a Front Desk/Receptionist job posting on its website between January 1 and December 31, 2023. The company is settling the case for $115,000.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who applied for a Front Desk/Receptionist position with Dependable Staffing in response to a job posting on its website or other media between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, where the job posting did not disclose the wage scale or salary range.
How to file
Submit a timely and valid Claim Form and W9 to receive a settlement payment. The claim deadline expired on May 16, 2025, and no new claims are being accepted.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30