CClaimWatch
Claims closedfinance

VanderKodde Debt Collection Interest Rate Settlement

Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →

What happened

The defendants allegedly violated federal and Michigan state law by applying unlawfully high interest rates to debt collection judgments. The defendants deny any wrongdoing. The lawsuit alleges that Mary Jane M. Elliott, P.C. collected judgment balances from debtors by communicating amounts that included interest rates exceeding those allowed by Michigan law.

Do you qualify?

The settlement includes two classes: (1) individuals against whom a money judgment was entered by a Michigan court in favor of Midland Funding, LLC for a debt incurred for personal, family, or household purposes (not on a written instrument or promissory note), and from whom Mary Jane M. Elliott, P.C. collected using unlawfully high interest rates from April 11, 2011 onward; and (2) individuals against whom a similar judgment was entered in favor of LVNV Funding, LLC with the same characteristics.

How to file

To claim benefits, you may do nothing and stay in the class to automatically share in the settlement if approved by the Court. Alternatively, you may submit a claim through the settlement website at vanderkoddeclassaction.com. Specific deadlines for claim submission will be determined after the Court approves the settlement on or about April 13, 2026.

Common questions

Is the VanderKodde Debt Collection Interest Rate Settlement notice real, or a scam?
Claims are filed at vanderkoddeclassaction.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
When will payments from the VanderKodde Debt Collection Interest Rate Settlement be sent?
Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for April 13, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More finance settlements

View all →
September 17, 2026finance

Patton v Trinity Settlement

Trinity Operating (USG) LLC allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments for oil and gas production proceeds from Oklahoma wells under the PRSA (Property Rights Security Act). The defendant denies all wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the uncertainty and expense of continued litigation.

To be determined under the Allocation Methodology based on individual circumstances.

November 5, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Schnucks Markets Rewards Points Sales Tax Settlement

Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full price of purchases before applying loyalty rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price after points were redeemed. The lawsuit claimed Schnucks illegally collected excess sales tax and failed to properly inform customers about this practice.

Up to $7

November 24, 2026finance

Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement

The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.

Up to $80

December 21, 2026consumer products

Kroger Rx Savings Club Settlement

Kroger allegedly failed to consider its Rx Savings Club or Health Savings Club prices when determining "usual and customary" (U&C) prices submitted for insurance claims. Plaintiffs contend Kroger should have used its lower Savings Club prices when calculating U&C prices, resulting in customers paying higher insurance copays. Kroger denies wrongdoing and maintains it correctly reported retail prices as U&C prices. The court has not decided the merits.

Payments calculated based on the amount a claimant paid for prescription drugs from Kroger where prescription insurance benefits were used.