Zwicky Assessment Settlement
Amount depends on the number of Points owned in the Association during the Class Period and the number of Class Members who excluded themselves.
Last verified September 18, 2026Source: jndHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Plaintiffs alleged that defendants misrepresented how much owners would have to pay in annual assessment fees for their timeshare interests in the Premiere Vacation Collection Owners Association. The defendants denied all allegations and continue to maintain they did nothing wrong. The parties settled to avoid the cost, risk, and delay of litigation.
Do you qualify?
Current or former members of the Premiere Vacation Collection Owners Association, Inc. who were assessed annual fees for any calendar year from 2011 through 2022. If you received a Notice, you are presumed to be a Class Member.
How to file
No claim filing was required. If you received a Notice and owned Points in the Association between 2011 and 2022, you will automatically receive a cash payment. The settlement was approved on April 16, 2024, and payments are being distributed based on Points owned during the Class Period.
Common questions
- How much does the Zwicky Assessment Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Amount depends on the number of Points owned in the Association during the Class Period and the number of Class Members who excluded themselves.. The total settlement fund is $13M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Zwicky Assessment Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the Zwicky Assessment Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- JND Legal Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at zwickyassessmentsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Zwicky Assessment Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for February 12, 2024; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Elizabeth Stryks-Shaw
- Vikki Osborn
- George Abarca
- Norman Zwicky
Defendants
- Diamond Resorts International
- Unknown Parties
- Linda Riddle
- C Alan Bentley
- David F Palmer
- Stephen J Cloobeck
- ILX Acquisition Incorporated
- Diamond Resorts International Incorporated
+ 4 more
Counsel for plaintiffs
Counsel for defendants
- James Christopher GoldenSacks Tierney PA
- James W ArmstrongSacks Tierney PA
- Brian E DitschSacks Tierney PA
- Andrew P BaumGlaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP - Los Angeles
- Hannah Hatch PorterGallagher & Kennedy PA - Phoenix
- Yameel L Mercado RoblesBaker & Hostetler LLP - Orlando, FL
- Mark Andrew FullerGallagher & Kennedy PA - Phoenix
- Julie Singer BradyBaker & Hostetler LLP - Orlando, FL
- Brandon CrosslandBaker & Hostetler LLP - Orlando, FL
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.
…moreUp to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.
…moreEqual payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.
…moreYour payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
…morePro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted