CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetconsumer products

King v. Monsanto Company Product Liability Class Action

Last verified September 19, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.

What happened

This is a proposed class action against Monsanto Company alleging personal injury and product liability. The case involves multiple named plaintiffs and has proceeded to federal appellate review, indicating allegations that the defendant's product allegedly caused injury to consumers who could form a class.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the King v. Monsanto Company Product Liability Class Action case?
No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
Where is the King v. Monsanto Company Product Liability Class Action case being heard?
The case is before the District Court, E.D. Missouri, case number 4:26-cv-00813. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Bruce Waldman
  • Michael Merx
  • Robert Koehler
  • Scott Butterfield
  • Monsanto Company
  • Randall King

Defendants

  • Matthew Huston
  • Bryan DuBose
  • Jonathan Berrien
  • Patricia Veal
  • William Szabo
  • William Robbins
  • Edward Peter Rankin
  • Frederick O'Neill

+ 4 more

Counsel for plaintiffs

Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.

In the news

Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.

New to class actions?

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More consumer products settlements

View all →
November 5, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement

Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.

…more

Up to $7

November 25, 2026No proof neededprivacy

Skin360 BIPA Settlement

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.

…more

Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)

November 27, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement

Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.

…more

Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.

December 14, 2026consumer products

Thinkware Dashcam Settlement

Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.

…more

Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted