CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetemployment

Langford v. First Advantage Corporation

Last verified July 13, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.

What happened

This proposed class action against First Advantage Corporation alleges a contract-related dispute. Based on the limited information available, the case appears to concern claims that may affect a class of individuals with contractual dealings with the defendant, though the specific nature of the alleged breach or harm is not detailed in the available docket materials.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Langford v. First Advantage Corporation case?
No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
Where is the Langford v. First Advantage Corporation case being heard?
The case is before the District Court, N.D. Georgia, case number 1:26-cv-03847. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Jacob Langford

Defendants

  • First Advantage Corporation

Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More employment settlements

View all →
September 16, 2026employment

Perry v. Alatrade Foods WARN Act Settlement

Plaintiff alleges that Alatrade Foods violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide at least 60 days' advance notice before a mass layoff or plant closing at its Phenix City, Alabama facility between February and August 2025. Alatrade denies all allegations and maintains it did not violate the WARN Act.

Payments to settlement class members will be made as back pay consisting of 100% wages with standard payroll taxes withheld

Deadline TBDemployment

Rad v. SkinSpirit Essential Settlement

SkinSpirit Essential, an employer in California, allegedly violated wage and hour laws by misclassifying employees and failing to pay required wages to non-exempt employees. The settlement includes both individual wage payments to class members and penalties under California's Private Attorney General Act.

Deadline TBDemployment

AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement

Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.

Deadline TBDemployment

PacBell Settlement

Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California labor laws by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline, in violation of Labor Code sections 233, 234, and 246.5. The company allegedly committed unfair business practices and is liable for civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Defendant denies all allegations.

A sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025