CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetconsumer products

Mayo v. Utz Quality Foods Class Action

Last verified August 22, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, E.D. New York (No. 2:26-cv-05126).

  1. August 20, 2026
    Case filed
  2. August 24, 2026
    Final approval granted

What happened

A proposed class action against Utz Quality Foods, LLC and Utz Brands, Inc. alleging fraud or violations of truth-in-lending laws. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of New York and names Michael Mayo as the plaintiff.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Mayo v. Utz Quality Foods Class Action case?
No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
Where is the Mayo v. Utz Quality Foods Class Action case being heard?
The case is before the District Court, E.D. New York, case number 2:26-cv-05126. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Michael Mayo

Defendants

  • Utz Brands, Inc.
  • Utz Quality Foods, LLC

Counsel for plaintiffs

Other cases these firms appear in

Parties and counsel from the public court docket; contact details as filed with the court. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.

New to class actions?

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More consumer products settlements

View all →
November 5, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement

Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.

…more

Up to $7

November 25, 2026No proof neededprivacy

Skin360 BIPA Settlement

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.

…more

Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)

November 27, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement

Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.

…more

Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.

December 14, 2026consumer products

Thinkware Dashcam Settlement

Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.

…more

Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted