Chowdhury v. Target Corporation Fraud Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, E.D. New York (No. 1:26-cv-03580).
- June 15, 2026Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Target Corporation alleging fraud or violations of truth-in-lending laws. The complaint was recently filed but specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket entries, which primarily contain administrative notices regarding an incomplete civil cover sheet.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Chowdhury v. Target Corporation Fraud Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed June 15, 2026 in the District Court, E.D. New York (No. 1:26-cv-03580).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Chowdhury v. Target Corporation Fraud Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Jason P. Sultzer (Sultzer & Lipari, PLLC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Ahmed Chowdhury
Defendants
- Target Corporation
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Jason P. SultzerSultzer & Lipari, PLLCRepresents Ahmed Chowdhury37 tracked casessultzerj@thesultzerlawgroup.com · (845) 483-7100
Other cases these firms appear in
- Mayo v. Utz Quality Foods Class Action · Sultzer & Lipari, PLLC
- Knox v. Chobani Data Breach or Fraud Class Action · Sultzer & Lipari, PLLC
- Gouldbourne v. Huel Inc. Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Class Action · Sultzer & Lipari, PLLC
- Kuntzsch v. Newell Brands Inc. Contract Class Action · Sultzer & Lipari, PLLC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
- Check your freezers: Ice cream sold at Walmart and Target part of latest urgent recallBiztoc.com · September 17, 2026
- IDF: Sirens in northern Israel likely caused by false target. Incident under reviewIsraelnationalnews.com · September 17, 2026
- The Dire National Crisis That Washington Won’t TouchThe New Republic · September 17, 2026
- Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Reportedly Moves Up 14A Risk Production To Q1 2027, As The Node’s Defect Density Races Toward TargetWccftech · September 16, 2026
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid