Morgan v. Cerner Corporation
Last verified September 16, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against Cerner Corporation, apparently concerning a contract-related dispute. The case was transferred from the Northern District of New York to the Western District of Missouri and has been consolidated into a master case. Based on the docket entries, the complaint involves Karen Morgan and appears to name medical institutions as additional parties, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Morgan v. Cerner Corporation case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the Morgan v. Cerner Corporation case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, W.D. Missouri, case number 4:26-cv-00721. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
Who's involved
Counsel for plaintiffs
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Sales Tax Class Action Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying reward points discounts, instead of excluding the discounted total from the sales tax base. This allegedly caused customers to pay more in sales tax than they should have on items purchased with reward points between May 2020 and August 2026. Schnucks denies wrongdoing but has agreed to settle and change its tax calculation practices.
…moreUp to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.
…moreEqual payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Natural Products Class Action Settlement
Dr. Squatch allegedly represented that certain of its shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products were natural even though they allegedly contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies all allegations and wrongdoing. The parties agreed to settle without any admission of liability to avoid further litigation costs and uncertainty.
…moreAmount calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
…morePro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid