OTO Development Employment Class Action
Verified October 26, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-00343).
- January 12, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action was filed against OTO Development, LLC, apparently concerning employment-related civil rights claims under Nature of Suit 442. Court records indicate the parties later agreed to dismiss the class allegations and submit the individual plaintiff's claims to arbitration. These are allegations only; no finding of wrongdoing or settlement is reflected in the docket text.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the OTO Development Employment Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed January 12, 2024 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-00343).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the OTO Development Employment Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Theodore Richard Tang (Law Offices of Robert Starr APC); Max William Gavron (Diversity Law Group APC); Kwanporn Tulyathan (Diversity Law Group APC); Emanuel M Starr (Frontier Law Center). For OTO Development, LLC: Daniel Chammas (FordHarrison LLP); Min Kyung Kim (Ford Harrison LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Houston Baxley
Defendants
- Does
- OTO Development, LLC
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Theodore Richard TangLaw Offices of Robert Starr APCRepresents Houston Baxleytheodore@starrlaw.com · (818) 225-9040
- Max William GavronDiversity Law Group APCRepresents Houston Baxley2 tracked casesmgavron@diversitylaw.com · (213) 488-6555
- Kwanporn TulyathanDiversity Law Group APCRepresents Houston Baxley3 tracked casesktulyathan@diversitylaw.com · (213) 488-6555
- Emanuel M StarrFrontier Law CenterRepresents Houston Baxleymanny@frontierlawcenter.com · (818) 914-3433
- Adam Morris RoseLaw Office of Robert Starr, APCRepresents Houston Baxley2 tracked casesadam@starrlaw.com · (818) 225-9040
- Larry W LeeDiversity Law Group PCRepresents Houston Baxley8 tracked caseslwlee@diversitylaw.com · (213) 488-6555
Counsel for defendants
- Daniel ChammasFordHarrison LLPRepresents OTO Development, LLC3 tracked casesdchammas@fordharrison.com · (213) 237-2400
- Min Kyung KimFord Harrison LLPRepresents OTO Development, LLC5 tracked casesmkim@fordharrison.com · (213) 237-2400
Other cases these firms appear in
- Amazon Employment Class Action · Diversity Law Group PC
- Swift Transportation Employment Discrimination Class Action · Diversity Law Group PC
- Williams Scotsman Employment Class Action · Diversity Law Group PC
- HRB Green Resources Labor Class Action · Diversity Law Group PC
- OTS Solutions Employment Class Action · Frontier Law Center
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
Amount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
A sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025