RSCR California Labor Class Action
Last verified October 7, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-07988).
- September 18, 2024Case filed
What happened
This is a proposed class action against RSCR California, Inc. The nature of suit is listed as 'Labor: Other,' suggesting allegations of labor law violations, though the specific claims are not detailed in the docket text. The docket reflects class certification scheduling and settlement discussions; the case was remanded to state court after removal.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the RSCR California Labor Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed September 18, 2024 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-07988).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the RSCR California Labor Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Scott Ernest Wheeler (Wheeler Law Firm APC); Justin Alexander Wheeler (Wheeler Law Firm APC); Aubry Wand (Wand Law Firm PC); James Alexander De Sario (Nourmand Law Firm APC). For RSCR California, Inc.: Christine A. Kurke (Tucker Ellis LLP); Alex Michael Barfield (Tucker Ellis LLP); Ronald G. Polly , Jr. (Tucker Ellis LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Marsha Chevalier
- Desiray Delgado
Defendants
- Does
- RSCR California, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Scott Ernest WheelerWheeler Law Firm APCRepresents Marsha Chevaliersew@scottwheelerlawoffice.com · (909) 621-4988
- Justin Alexander WheelerWheeler Law Firm APCRepresents Marsha Chevalierjaw@scottwheelerlawoffice.com · (909) 621-4988
- Aubry WandWand Law Firm PCRepresents Marsha Chevalier2 tracked casesawand@wandlawfirm.com · (310) 590-4503
- James Alexander De SarioNourmand Law Firm APCRepresents Desiray Delgado2 tracked casesjdesario@nourmandlawfirm.com · (310) 553-3600
- Michael NourmandNourmand Law Firm APCRepresents Desiray Delgado2 tracked casesmnourmand@nourmandlawfirm.com · (310) 553-3600
Counsel for defendants
- Christine A. KurkeTucker Ellis LLPRepresents RSCR California, Inc.christine.kurke@tuckerellis.com · (404) 678-6367
- Alex Michael BarfieldTucker Ellis LLPRepresents RSCR California, Inc.alex.barfield@tuckerellis.com · (216) 430-3400
- Ronald G. Polly , Jr.Tucker Ellis LLPRepresents RSCR California, Inc.2 tracked casesron.polly@tuckerellis.com · (404) 678-6364
Other cases these firms appear in
- Kreutter v. Procter & Gamble Consumer Class Action · Wand Law Firm PC
- American Bottling Employment Class Action · Nourmand Law Firm APC
- Walton v. CVS Pharmacy Fraud Class Action · Tucker Ellis LLP
- Jackson v. Amerimed Emergency Medical Services ERISA Class Action · Tucker Ellis LLP
- Choudhry v. Mead Johnson & Company Product Liability Class Action · Tucker Ellis LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
Amount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
A sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025