SCIS Air Security Labor Class Action
Last verified October 9, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-07019).
- August 19, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against SCIS Air Security Corporation, apparently concerning employment-related claims under California labor law. The case was removed to federal court from Los Angeles Superior Court, and the court granted the plaintiff's motion to remand, sending it back to state court. Specific allegations are not detailed in the docket entries.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the SCIS Air Security Labor Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed August 19, 2024 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-07019).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the SCIS Air Security Labor Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh (Justice Law Corporation); Christopher K Petersen (Justice Law Corporation); Brian Jeong (Justice Law Corporation); Douglas Han (Justice Law Corporation). For SCIS Air Security Corporation: Sage Stone (Blackstone Law, APC); Ryan Hamilton Crosner (Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC); Chloe Suh-Yon Chang (Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Jasmine Torres
Defendants
- Does
- SCIS Air Security Corporation
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Shunt Tatavos-GharajehJustice Law CorporationRepresents Jasmine Torres8 tracked casesstatavos@justicelawcorp.com · (818) 230-7502
- Christopher K PetersenJustice Law CorporationRepresents Jasmine Torres3 tracked casescpetersen@justicelawcorp.com · (818) 230-7502
- Brian JeongJustice Law CorporationRepresents Jasmine Torres2 tracked cases(818) 230-7502
- Douglas HanJustice Law CorporationRepresents Jasmine Torres9 tracked casesdhan@justicelawcorp.com · (818) 230-7502
Counsel for defendants
- Sage StoneBlackstone Law, APCRepresents SCIS Air Security Corporation3 tracked casessstone@blackstonepc.com · (310) 622-4278
- Ryan Hamilton CrosnerOgletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PCRepresents SCIS Air Security Corporation2 tracked casesryan.crosner@ogletree.com · (213) 239-9800
- Chloe Suh-Yon ChangOgletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PCRepresents SCIS Air Security Corporation2 tracked caseschloe.chang@ogletree.com · (213) 239-9800
Other cases these firms appear in
- Rodriguez v. Tyson Foods Employment Class Action · Justice Law Corporation
- Preciado v. McCain Foods USA Inc · Justice Law Corporation
- Randle v. Caterpillar Logistics Employment Class Action · Justice Law Corporation
- US Foods Labor Class Action · Justice Law Corporation
- Valentine v. Bay Equity LLC Employment Class Action · Blackstone Law, APC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
Amount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
A sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025