Uber Personal Property Class Action
Last verified October 11, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, S.D. Florida (No. 0:24-cv-61340).
- July 25, 2024Case filed
What happened
A putative class action was filed against Uber Technologies, Inc., apparently over personal property issues, according to the case caption and nature-of-suit code. Uber moved to compel arbitration, and the plaintiff subsequently filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. The available docket text does not detail the specific allegations, so this description is limited to what the filing metadata indicates.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Uber Personal Property Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed July 25, 2024 in the District Court, S.D. Florida (No. 0:24-cv-61340).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Uber Personal Property Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Manuel Santiago Hiraldo (Hiraldo P.A.); Michael Eisenband (Eisenband Law, P.A.). For Uber Technologies, Inc.: Jonathan Bart Morton (K&L Gates LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- STEPHANIE MARTIN
Defendants
- UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Manuel Santiago HiraldoHiraldo P.A.Represents STEPHANIE MARTIN62 tracked cases · $26M in disclosed settlementsmhiraldo@hiraldolaw.com · (954) 400-4713
- Michael EisenbandEisenband Law, P.A.Represents STEPHANIE MARTIN30 tracked casesmeisenband@Eisenbandlaw.com · (954) 533-4092
Counsel for defendants
- Jonathan Bart MortonK&L Gates LLPRepresents UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.3 tracked casesjonathan.morton@klgates.com · (305) 539-3357
Other cases these firms appear in
- Instavision TCPA Class Action · Hiraldo P.A.
- Bridges v. Foundation Systems of Michigan Class Action · Hiraldo P.A.
- Peck v. What If Media Group Class Action · Hiraldo P.A.
- Castillejos v. Orthotech TCPA Class Action · Hiraldo P.A.
- Seng v. Debt Collectors International TCPA Class Action · Eisenband Law, P.A.
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More other settlements
View all →Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detainment Settlement
From $685.87
Limetree Bay Refinery Incidents Settlement
Payments will be calculated using a pro rata point system encompassing property damage, nuisance, trespass, economic losses, cistern related physical impact, physical and emotional health manifestations, and non-reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses incurred that arose from the Limetree Bay Refinery release incidents.
SPS Technologies Fire Settlement
Up to $5,300
NCAA Concussion Settlement Medical Monitoring Program
Free medical screening and free medical evaluations up to two times