Other class action settlements
Class action settlements across other categories.
Other settlements by the numbers
A settlement fund is the total a defendant agreed to pay, not what any one claimant receives — most funds are divided among everyone who files. Settlements are negotiated agreements, and defendants typically deny wrongdoing rather than being found liable.
The 21 settlements in this category that publish a fund, grouped by size. Most cluster low and a few are very large — which is why the headline figure above is a median rather than an average.
| Fund size | Settlements | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $1M | 1 | 5% | |
| $1M – $5M | 5 | 24% | |
| $5M – $25M | 9 | 43% | |
| $25M – $100M | 3 | 14% | |
| $100M and up | 3 | 14% |
A fund is the total a defendant agreed to pay, not an individual payout.
Get new claim opportunities by email
Free alerts for new settlements and deadlines. Unsubscribe anytime.
Accepting claims now
Malik Tucker v. King County Settlement
King County detained people at the King County Jail for more than 48 hours without a probable cause determination between January 2, 2021, and April 23, 2025. The lawsuit challenged these detention practices, and King County agreed to pay compensation to affected individuals.
$150–$1,500
NCAA Concussion Settlement Medical Monitoring Program
The NCAA is providing a medical monitoring program for former student-athletes who may have suffered concussions while playing NCAA-sanctioned sports. The settlement offers free medical screening and evaluations to eligible class members.
Free medical screening and free medical evaluations up to two times
Frank v. City of Pensacola Natural Gas Franchise Fee Settlement
Customers were allegedly charged franchise fees for natural gas service in Pensacola. The City of Pensacola has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit by making payments to affected customers.
Other cases in litigation
Filed and being fought in court. These are allegations — there is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet.
Lema v. Apple American Group Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Apple American Group LLC in federal court in Ohio. The complaint alleges unspecified claims under the broad category of "Other" personal injury matters, with a jury demand. The specific allegations and legal theories are not disclosed in the available docket entries.
Benavides Moran v. Ana Luisa Retail LLC Americans with Disabilities Act Class Action
A proposed class action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act against Ana Luisa Retail LLC, apparently concerning alleged discrimination or failure to provide accommodations related to disability. The complaint was filed on behalf of Washington Benavides Moran and potentially other similarly situated individuals.
Marin v. Bravest Studios Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action filed in the Southern District of Florida alleging fraud by Bravest Studios, LLC. Based on the docket caption alone, the specific nature of the alleged fraudulent conduct is not evident, but the case appears to concern claims that could affect ordinary consumers or account holders.
Rivera v. Bop, LLC Americans with Disabilities Act Class Action
A proposed class action under the Americans with Disabilities Act alleges that Bop, LLC failed to provide adequate accessibility accommodations. The complaint includes medical certification and website error reports, suggesting the defendant's digital platform or services may not comply with disability access requirements.
Benavides Moran v. Fulton And Roark LLC Disability Rights Class Action
A proposed class action under the Americans with Disabilities Act has been filed against Fulton And Roark LLC. The complaint alleges disability discrimination, though the specific nature of the alleged violation is not detailed in the available docket entries. This appears to concern accessibility or accommodation issues that could affect consumers or employees with disabilities.
Benavides Moran v. MAM USA Holding Inc. – Americans with Disabilities Act Class Action
A proposed class action under the Americans with Disabilities Act has been filed against MAM USA Holding Inc. The complaint alleges civil rights violations related to disability discrimination, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket entry alone. Ordinary individuals with disabilities could plausibly be class members if the claims concern accessibility, accommodation, or other disability-related grievances affecting the company's customers, employees, or service users.
Benavides Moran v. Tru Diagnostic Americans with Disabilities Act Class Action
A proposed class action brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act against Tru Diagnostic, LLC. The complaint alleges disability discrimination, though the specific nature of the alleged discriminatory conduct is not detailed in the docket entries provided. Ordinary individuals with disabilities could plausibly be class members if the claims involve inaccessible services, facilities, or programs operated by the defendant.
Benavides Moran v. Winx Health Inc. ADA Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Winx Health Inc. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, apparently alleging that the defendant failed to provide adequate accommodations or access to individuals with disabilities. The specific factual allegations are not detailed in the available docket information.
Rivera v. Oats Overnight, Inc. Disability Access Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Oats Overnight, Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act or similar disability rights laws, apparently concerning website accessibility or other barriers to disabled consumers. The complaint includes medical certification and website error documentation as exhibits.
Lopez v. Darvin Furniture and Appliance of Orland Park
A proposed class action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act against a furniture and appliance retailer. The lawsuit apparently concerns alleged discrimination or failure to provide reasonable accommodations related to disability access or services at the defendant's business.
Benavides Moran v. Force Factor LLC Disability Rights Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Force Factor LLC violated the Americans with Disabilities Act or similar civil rights protections. The specific nature of the alleged disability discrimination or accessibility failure is not detailed in the available docket information, but may concern product labeling, website accessibility, or other consumer-facing barriers affecting individuals with disabilities.
Benavides Moran v. J & J Group, LLC - Disability Rights Class Action
This proposed class action alleges disability discrimination by J & J Group, LLC under the Americans with Disabilities Act or similar civil rights laws. The case was filed in federal district court based on alleged violations affecting individuals with disabilities, though specific details regarding the nature of the alleged discrimination are not available from the docket entry provided.
Closed to new claims
Past the filing deadline — kept so you can look up what a case was about and what it paid.
Polyclinic Compensation Fund Settlement
The U.S. Department of Justice investigated whether The Polyclinic failed to provide qualified interpreters for patients with hearing, vision, and/or speech disabilities between January 2021 and September 2025. The DOJ alleges this violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Polyclinic agreed to pay $350,000 to resolve the investigation without admitting wrongdoing.
Chaisson v. University of Southern California Late Fees Settlement
USC charged students late registration fees, late settlement fees, and monthly finance charges between July 2016 and March 2026. Plaintiffs allege these fees are unlawful penalties and forfeitures under California law. USC denies the allegations and contends the fees comply with California law.
Cincinnati Protest Settlement
People were subjected to physical arrest during political protests in Cincinnati from May 29-June 8, 2020, were charged with misdemeanors, and those charges were later dismissed. The settlement provides compensation to those arrested during these protests.
Baer v. Shannondell Residence Fee Refund Settlement
Shannondell, Inc. allegedly breached its Residence and Care Agreement with former residents by deducting costs for refurbishment and restoration of units from residents' Entrance Fee Refunds. Shannondell denies these claims. This settlement avoids the costs and risks of continued litigation and provides $4.4 million in relief to the class.
Monterey County Jail CFMG Contempt Fines Settlement
In September 2023, the Court found CFMG, the Jail's health care provider, in contempt for violating Court orders about medical, mental health, and dental care. CFMG has agreed to pay $2,470,000 to compensate for violations of Court orders about minimum standards of care at the Monterey County Jail.
Paid From $110
Capital One Shopping Settlement
Capital One Shopping was involved in affiliate marketing transactions with merchants. Settlement Class Members claim they earned affiliate commissions related to these transactions but did not receive proper payment or compensation from Capital One Shopping.
Paid From $20
Anthropic Copyright Settlement
Anthropic is settling a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by copyright owners whose works were allegedly used in the development of Anthropic's AI technology without authorization.
Winston Weaver Fire Evacuation Class Action Settlement
A fire at the Winston Weaver facility on January 31, 2022, caused an evacuation of the surrounding area. The lawsuit alleges the defendant's negligence, gross negligence, and public/private nuisance caused the fire and evacuation. The defendant denies the allegations and any wrongdoing, but agreed to settle the dispute.
Paid Pro-rata cash payment to members of the Settlement Class who submit a valid and timely Claim Form
Residential Real Estate Broker Commissions Antitrust Settlements
Multiple residential real estate brokers and the National Association of Realtors were accused of engaging in antitrust violations related to real estate broker commissions. The defendants have agreed to settle these allegations totaling over $1 billion.
Maui Fires Class Settlement
A number of companies, individuals, and Hawai'i government entities caused damages through the August 2023 Maui wildfires (Lahaina, Olinda, and Kula fires). The defendants have agreed to settle related class action lawsuits to avoid the costs, risks, and uncertainties of continuing litigation. The defendants deny any wrongdoing.
Butler v. Suffolk County Jail Settlement
From May 2011, plaintiffs sued Suffolk County on behalf of a class of detainees and inmates held in Suffolk County Correctional Facilities, alleging unconstitutional conditions. A settlement was reached in February 2025, with Suffolk County agreeing to pay $18 million to resolve the claims.
LA County Juvenile Detention Settlement
The County of Los Angeles detained minors in Los Angeles County Juvenile Hall and Camp facilities. The settlement compensates class members for their detention, with the county paying $30 million to resolve the lawsuit.
Paid From $7,000
Metairie Towers Condominium Class Action Settlement
The Metairie Towers Condominium Association allegedly wasted and misallocated insurance proceeds collected from the Hurricane Ida settlement and a September 28, 2021 water damage event. The settlements resolve claims against multiple insurance companies for this misallocation of funds.
MN DVS Record Expungement Class Action
The Minnesota Department of Public Safety's Driver and Vehicle Services division allegedly failed to follow court expungement orders and state statute requirements to seal criminal records as ordered. The defendants deny liability, but agreed to settle the lawsuit as a compromise to end the case.
Paid Up to $15,000
Fashion Nova Website Accessibility Settlement
Fashion Nova's website was allegedly inaccessible to legally blind individuals using screen reading software, denying them an experience equivalent to sighted individuals. Fashion Nova denies these allegations and maintains it did nothing wrong. The settlement is not an admission of guilt or wrongdoing.
Paid Up to $4,000
Holian Class Action Settlement
A fire broke out at the Chemtool Manufacturing Plant in Rockton, Illinois on June 14, 2021. Holian Insulation Company, Inc. is resolving litigation arising from this incident by establishing a $5.5 million settlement fund to compensate affected class members.
Ithaca College Tuition Refund Settlement
Ithaca College switched to remote learning and services in mid-March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Students allege the college breached its contract by no longer providing in-person and on-campus educational services and access to campus facilities for which they had paid full tuition and fees. Ithaca denies liability and claims students received the contracted-for services.
Paid Individual payout amount not specified; settlement fund of $1,500,000 will be distributed to class members after deducting notice, administration costs, service award to plaintiff, and attorney fees and costs
Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center (SBCC) Use of Force Settlement
The Massachusetts Department of Correction is accused of using unconstitutional force against approximately 150 incarcerated individuals at Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center between January 10, 2020, and February 6, 2020. The lawsuit also alleges that correction officers discriminated against Black and Latinx incarcerated individuals during this period. The Commonwealth has agreed to pay $6,750,000 (inclusive of attorneys' fees) and implement policy changes to address the allegations.
University of Washington COVID Litigation Settlement
University of Washington transitioned to remote instruction in March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with Washington legal mandates. Students alleged they were entitled to partial refunds of tuition and fees for Winter Quarter 2020 and/or Spring Quarter 2020 because of the shift to remote learning. UW denies all allegations of wrongdoing.
Paid Remaining settlement funds after attorneys' fees, service awards, and administrative costs will be divided equally among approximately 56,000 settlement class members
DraftKings NFT Settlement
DraftKings is paying $10 million to settle a class action lawsuit involving NFT transactions in DraftKings accounts. The page does not specify what the defendant allegedly did wrong or admit any wrongdoing.
Paid Individual payment amounts cannot be determined at this time and will depend on the number of valid claims submitted and the Net Settlement Fund after deductions for taxes, administrative costs, attorneys' fees, and Court-approved expenses.
Sutter Anesthesia Billing Lawsuit Settlement
Sutter Health allegedly engaged in fraudulent, unlawful, and unfair billing practices by submitting and receiving payment on bills for anesthesia services that were not rendered, were double-billed, or were misleadingly described. This caused self-funded payers to pay more for anesthesia services than they should have. Sutter Health denies all allegations and maintains that its practices complied with applicable laws.
Smith v. District of Columbia Settlement
Between May 15, 2012 and October 10, 2014, the District of Columbia's Metropolitan Police Department arrested and/or prosecuted individuals for violations of the District's gun control laws outside their home or place of business. The settlement compensates eligible class members for these arrests and prosecutions.
Local TV Advertising Settlement
The defendants allegedly conspired to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices for broadcast television spot advertising. Sales rep firms and a third party allegedly facilitated communication between the broadcaster defendants. The settling defendants deny all wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs and risks.
Paid Payments to be determined after deducting settlement administration costs, taxes, class representative incentive awards, attorneys' fees (not to exceed 33.33% of the settlement), and litigation costs/expenses (not to exceed $6,000,000).
Grande Games Settlement
The lawsuit claims that SpinX Games Limited violated Washington's gambling laws and Consumer Protection Act by selling virtual coins in social casino-style games including Cash Frenzy, Lotsa Slots, Jackpot World, Vegas Friends, Jackpot Mania, Jackpot Fever, DAFU, Cash Bash, and Jackpot Crush. Defendants deny all claims and that they violated any law.