CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetprivacy

Verogen Genetic Data Privacy Class Action

Last verified October 4, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, S.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-01977).

  1. October 24, 2024
    Case filed

What happened

A proposed class action against Verogen, Inc. apparently brought by individual consumers. The docket indicates contract claims and cites a similar case involving a genomics company, suggesting the dispute may concern consumer genetic data or related services. The case is ongoing, with motions to dismiss and amended complaints, and no settlement is indicated.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Verogen Genetic Data Privacy Class Action case?
No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed October 24, 2024 in the District Court, S.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-01977).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the Verogen Genetic Data Privacy Class Action?
For the plaintiffs: Jonathan M. Jagher (Justice Jagher London & Millen LLC); Frank Hedin (Hedin LLP). For Verogen, Inc.: Melanie Blunschi (Latham & Watkins LLP); Francis John Acott (Latham & Watkins); Catherine Anne Rizzoni (Latham & Watkins LLP); Paul John Yovanic , Jr. (Seyfarth Shaw). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Phyllis Nichols
  • Kirsten Curley
  • Lawrence Novida
  • Robin Cook
  • Erica Nathan
  • Sharyl Yeisley
  • Andrew Starin
  • Chelsea Gardner

+ 6 more

Defendants

  • Meta Platforms, Inc.
  • Qiagen North American Holdings, Inc.
  • Verogen, Inc.

Counsel for plaintiffs

  • Jonathan M. JagherJustice Jagher London & Millen LLC
    Represents Angela Hutcheson, Sara Lafler, Alucard Taylor, Kama Delk, Erin Radcliffe, Mikhaila Diekmann, Chelsea Gardner, Andrew Starin, Sharyl Yeisley, Erica Nathan, Robin Cook, Lawrence Novida, Kirsten Curley, Phyllis Nichols
    6 tracked cases
    jjagher@jjlmlaw.com · (610) 234-6486
  • Frank HedinHedin LLP
    Represents Angela Hutcheson, Sara Lafler, Alucard Taylor, Kama Delk, Erin Radcliffe, Mikhaila Diekmann, Chelsea Gardner, Andrew Starin, Sharyl Yeisley, Erica Nathan, Robin Cook, Lawrence Novida, Kirsten Curley, Phyllis Nichols
    28 tracked cases
    fhedin@hedinllp.com · (305) 357-2107

Counsel for defendants

Other cases these firms appear in

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More privacy settlements

View all →