Wright v. Uber Technologies Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:26-cv-07753).
- July 27, 2026Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against Uber Technologies, Inc. in federal court. While the docket entries do not disclose the specific allegations, the case involves plaintiff Hassan Wright and has been assigned to Judge James Donato in the Northern District of California with a case management conference scheduled for December 2026.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Wright v. Uber Technologies Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed July 27, 2026 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:26-cv-07753).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Wright v. Uber Technologies Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Raphael Janove (Janove PLLC); Ryan Crosswell (Singleton Schreiber, LLP); Liana Vitale (Janove PLLC); Jennifer Yadoo (Singleton Schreiber, LLP). For Uber Technologies, Inc.: Sati Harutyunyan (Jenner & Block LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Hassan Wright
Defendants
- Uber Technologies, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Raphael JanoveJanove PLLCRepresents Hassan Wright26 tracked casesraphael@janove.law · (646) 347-3940
- Ryan CrosswellSingleton Schreiber, LLPRepresents Hassan Wrightrcrosswell@singletonschreiber.com · (619) 771-3473
- Liana VitaleJanove PLLCRepresents Hassan Wright3 tracked casesliana@janove.law · (646) 479-6001
- Jennifer YadooSingleton Schreiber, LLPRepresents Hassan Wrightjyadoo@singletonschreiber.com · (619) 771-3473
- Elizabeth Anne AniskevichSingleton Schreiber, LLPRepresents Hassan Wrighteaniskevich@singletonschreiber.com · (619) 782-7119
- Anna C. HaacHaac Law LLCRepresents Hassan Wright2 tracked casesanna@haaclaw.com · (240) 389-0199
Counsel for defendants
- Sati HarutyunyanJenner & Block LLPRepresents Uber Technologies, Inc.2 tracked casessharutyunyan@jenner.com · (213) 239-5100
Other cases these firms appear in
- Jackson-Hill v. Steven Madden Ltd. Product Liability Class Action · Janove PLLC
- iRobot Consumer Class Action · Janove PLLC
- Wolf v. Amazon.com Inc. Fraud Class Action · Janove PLLC
- Medtronic Data Security Incident Class Action · Janove PLLC
- Radley Alcantara v. American Honda Motor Co. Class Action · Singleton Schreiber, LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
Amount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
A sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025