595 Baltic Asset LLC Rent Overcharge Settlement
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 13, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The defendant received 421-a tax benefits for the building at 595 Baltic Street, which required all apartments to be rent-stabilized. Plaintiffs allege that the defendant violated New York State law by failing to account for rent concessions when setting initial rents and preferential rents, causing tenants to be charged more than the maximum legal rent allowed.
Do you qualify?
Current or former tenants who occupied an apartment at 595 Baltic Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11217 at any time from February 27, 2016 to September 17, 2025.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Past rent overcharges reimbursement
Class members can receive money for past rent overcharges by submitting a claim.
Who is in the class
Current or former tenant, who occupied your apartment at any time from February 27, 2016 to September 17, 2025, of the building located at 595 Baltic Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11217
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a claim by February 13, 2026 to receive money for past rent overcharges. The website provides claim information, but the specific online claim process or required documentation is not detailed on this page.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the 595 Baltic Asset LLC Rent Overcharge Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 13, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the 595 Baltic Asset LLC Rent Overcharge Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at 595balticsettlementclassaction.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the 595 Baltic Asset LLC Rent Overcharge Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for February 25, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more