Cantonwine v. Mehos Rental Settlement
Last verified August 21, 2026Source: atticusHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was November 25, 2023. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The defendants allegedly failed to return security deposits to tenants and engaged in negligent property management practices at rental apartments in Salida, Colorado. The defendants have not admitted wrongdoing but have agreed to settle the lawsuit.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who rented apartments from the defendants at 102-120 D Street, 233 E. 1st Street, or 117 ½ F Street in Salida, Colorado from April 25, 2015 to the present. Special classes include those who had security deposits withheld or those who lived at the D Street apartments on May 2, 2017.
How to file
Submit a valid Claim Form by November 25, 2023 by either filing electronically at the website or downloading and emailing the form. You must provide information about your tenancy at one of the listed addresses to qualify.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Cantonwine v. Mehos Rental Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was November 25, 2023. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Cantonwine v. Mehos Rental Settlement?
- Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
- Is the Cantonwine v. Mehos Rental Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Atticus Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at mehossettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Cantonwine v. Mehos Rental Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying reward points discounts, instead of calculating sales tax on the discounted total after rewards were applied. The company collected excess sales tax on these transactions between May 2020 and August 2026 in Missouri.
Up to $7
Dr. Squatch Natural Products Class Action Settlement
Dr. Squatch allegedly marketed certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap, and other personal care products as natural despite containing synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies the allegations and continues to maintain the products were properly labeled. The company has agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
Pro rata share of settlement fund based on number of valid claims submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid
Kroger Savings Club Prescription Insurance Settlement
Kroger allegedly failed to consider the prices it charged under its Rx Savings Club or Health Savings Club when determining its usual and customary (U&C) prices submitted to insurance companies. Plaintiffs claim Kroger should have considered these lower Savings Club prices when determining U&C prices for insurance claims. Kroger denies wrongdoing and maintains it correctly reported its retail prices as U&C prices. The court has not decided who is right.
Payments will be calculated based on the amount a claimant paid, in whole or in part, for prescription drugs from Kroger using prescription insurance during the Settlement Class Period.