CAVU eCommerce Service Charge Settlement
Pro rata share based on total amount of service charges paid
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was January 15, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
CAVU eCommerce failed to properly disclose a mandatory "Service Charge" for online bookings on Airportparkingreservations.com and Airportparking.com, allegedly violating California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendant denies any wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid ongoing litigation expenses.
Do you qualify?
California residents who made a booking on Airportparkingreservations.com and/or Airportparking.com between July 1, 2024, and March 10, 2025, and paid a mandatory service charge in connection with such booking.
How to file
Submit a claim form by January 15, 2026. You must have been a California resident who made a qualifying booking and paid the service charge. Settlement payments are being distributed based on pro rata shares of service charges paid.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Tuft & Needle Deceptive Discount Advertising Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products sold on its website. The defendant denies liability and wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims.
Up to $75
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries - Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries and related companies sold mattresses containing fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering the foam. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the mattress cover or be released if the cover is removed, causing potential economic harm, property damage, or physical effects. The defendants deny all allegations and wrongdoing, and are settling for purposes of judicial efficiency.
Voucher good for use on single purchase at Ashley Furniture retailers; pro rata share based on total valid claims from $9 million Common Voucher Fund, plus potential pro rata cash payment if attorneys' fees and costs awarded are less than $3 million
Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement
Nutramax Laboratories allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplements in advertising and packaging. The company has reached an $11.5 million settlement without admitting wrongdoing.
$25–$150
Shimano Crankset Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to a crash hazard. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and sought relief in connection with the advertising and marketing of the defendants' products and the alleged inadequacy of the voluntary recall. The defendants deny any wrongdoing and no physical injuries were alleged.
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired)