Equal Pay Settlement - Hewlett Packard Enterprise
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Female employees of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company in California alleged that the company engaged in unequal pay practices in violation of the California Equal Pay Act and other employment laws. The company denies all claims and contends it complied with applicable laws.
Do you qualify?
Women who were actively employed in California by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company between November 1, 2015 and November 3, 2022 in one of the job codes set forth in the Settlement Agreement.
How to file
No action is required to receive a payment—class members will automatically receive payment and release their legal rights. Alternatively, members may opt out to retain their legal rights, or object to the settlement by writing to the Settlement Administrator before the Final Fairness Hearing scheduled for April 27, 2023.
Common questions
- Is the Equal Pay Settlement - Hewlett Packard Enterprise notice real, or a scam?
- Atticus Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at equalpaysettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Equal Pay Settlement - Hewlett Packard Enterprise be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for April 27, 2023; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
SkinSpirit Essential Employee Wage and Hour Settlement
SkinSpirit Essential is paying to settle a class action lawsuit brought by former employee Sarah Rad alleging wage and hour violations under California law. The settlement covers wages and penalties for non-exempt employees who worked for SkinSpirit during the class period and penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (PAGA).
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
Hill v. Delphinus Engineering Inc. Settlement
Delphinus Engineering Inc. allegedly failed to disclose wage scales, salary ranges, and general descriptions of benefits and other compensation in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and denies any violation of law.
The settlement fund ranges from $1,802,386.04 to $2,745,000.00 depending on the number of claims submitted.