Illinois AG v Direct Energy Settlement
Last verified September 12, 2026Source: atticusHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
What happened
Direct Energy Services LLC, an alternative retail electric supplier, engaged in fraudulent, unfair and deceptive business practices to mislead Illinois consumers. The company deceptively enrolled consumers in its services and charged electricity rates over 230% more than consumers would have paid under their default public utility rates, violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
Do you qualify?
Current and former customers who received residential electricity supply services from Direct Energy between June 2013 and April 2025 in Illinois.
How to file
Contact the Settlement Administrator, Atticus Administration, at (800) 893-1707 or via email at [email protected] for information on how to receive restitution payments and to submit claims.
Common questions
- How much does the Illinois AG v Direct Energy Settlement pay?
- The total settlement fund is $12M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- Is the Illinois AG v Direct Energy Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Atticus Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at ildirectenergysettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- How long until I get paid from the Illinois AG v Direct Energy Settlement?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
- What happens if I do nothing?
- You receive no payment, and in most class actions you also give up the right to sue Direct Energy Services, LLC separately over these same claims.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Rewards Points Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full price of purchases before applying loyalty rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price after points were redeemed. The lawsuit claimed Schnucks illegally collected excess sales tax and failed to properly inform customers about this practice.
Up to $7
Dr. Squatch "Natural" Products Settlement
Dr. Squatch allegedly represented that its shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products were natural, even though they allegedly contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies these allegations and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid further litigation expenses and uncertainty, with no admission of wrongdoing by Dr. Squatch.
Pro rata payment based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the Settlement Class
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid
Kroger Rx Savings Club Settlement
Kroger allegedly failed to consider its Rx Savings Club or Health Savings Club prices when determining "usual and customary" (U&C) prices submitted for insurance claims. Plaintiffs contend Kroger should have used its lower Savings Club prices when calculating U&C prices, resulting in customers paying higher insurance copays. Kroger denies wrongdoing and maintains it correctly reported retail prices as U&C prices. The court has not decided the merits.
Payments calculated based on the amount a claimant paid for prescription drugs from Kroger where prescription insurance benefits were used.