Illinois Attorney General v. DoorDash - Pay Guarantee Settlement
proportional share of the Settlement Fund based on the amount of Consumer tips allegedly used by DoorDash to satisfy the Guaranteed Amounts
Last verified August 25, 2026Source: atticusHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 10, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
DoorDash allegedly violated Illinois consumer protection law by using consumer tips to Dashers as credit toward minimum pay guarantees, while leading consumers to believe their tips would increase Dasher earnings above the promised pay. The settlement provides payments to affected Dashers who worked in Illinois during the relevant period.
Do you qualify?
Dashers who completed deliveries using DoorDash in Illinois between July 2017 and September 2019, were paid under the Pay Guarantee Model, and received tips on deliveries that were allegedly used by DoorDash to satisfy the Guaranteed Amounts offered on those orders.
How to file
Fill out a Claim Form by the deadline of February 10, 2025. If you complete the form by that date, you will receive your payment shortly after March 4, 2025. No specific proof requirements are mentioned for the basic claim.
Common questions
- How much does the Illinois Attorney General v. DoorDash - Pay Guarantee Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: proportional share of the Settlement Fund based on the amount of Consumer tips allegedly used by DoorDash to satisfy the Guaranteed Amounts. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Illinois Attorney General v. DoorDash - Pay Guarantee Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 10, 2025. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Illinois Attorney General v. DoorDash - Pay Guarantee Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the Illinois Attorney General v. DoorDash - Pay Guarantee Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- DoorDash Settlement Administrator is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at ildoordashsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Illinois Attorney General v. DoorDash - Pay Guarantee Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Perry v. Alatrade Foods WARN Act Settlement
Plaintiff alleges that Alatrade Foods violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide at least 60 days' advance notice before terminating employees due to a mass layoff or plant closing at its Phenix City, Alabama facility between February and August 2025. Alatrade denies all allegations and liability.
Back pay consisting of 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; exact amount depends on individual employment records
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
PacBell Settlement - Labor Law Violations
Pacific Bell Telephone Company is accused of violating California's kin-care law and paid sick-days law through policies that treated the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to employee discipline. The company denies these allegations and liability.
Payment based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
Guitar Center Wage and Hour Settlement
Guitar Center is accused of wage and hour violations affecting non-exempt employees. The settlement includes back wages for workers during the class period and penalties under California's Private Attorneys General Act. The defendant has not admitted wrongdoing.