Ocwen Fee Settlement
$60–$70
Last verified September 18, 2026Source: jndHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was September 29, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC allegedly over-charged borrowers for property valuation expenses, including Broker Price Opinions (BPOs) and Hybrid Valuations, which contained undisclosed mark-ups. Ocwen denies the allegations. The parties agreed to settle to avoid the costs, risks, and delays of continued litigation.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who had a loan serviced by Ocwen and paid for one or more Broker Price Opinions or Hybrid Valuations charged by Ocwen through Altisource between November 5, 2010, and September 29, 2017. A California Sub-Class includes California residents with these charges assessed to their mortgage account during the same period.
How to file
You must submit a valid claim electronically or by mail postmarked by September 29, 2025 (the deadline has passed). Visit the settlement website to file your claim. By submitting a claim, you give up your right to sue Ocwen for the claims in this case.
Common questions
- How much does the Ocwen Fee Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: $60–$70. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Ocwen Fee Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was September 29, 2025. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Ocwen Fee Settlement?
- Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
- Is the Ocwen Fee Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- JND Legal Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at ocwenfeesettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Ocwen Fee Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for September 19, 2024; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- David Weiner
Defendants
- Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
- Ocwen Financial Corporation
Counsel for plaintiffs
Counsel for defendants
- Erika Maki RaschO'Melveny & Myers, LLP
- Richard Jacobsen , PHVOrrick Herrington
- Randy Scott LuskeyPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
- Melinda L. HaagPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
- Jennifer Christine LeeOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
- James Abbott BowmanO'Melveny & Myers, LLP
- Elizabeth Lemond McKeenO'Melveny & Myers LLP
- Catalina Joos VergaraO'Melveny & Myers
- Ashley PavelO'Melveny & Myers LLP
- Aaron Michael RubinOrrick Herrington Sutcliffe LLP
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more