CClaimWatch
Claims closedemployment

Sarmiento v. Fresh Harvest

Last verified August 19, 2026Source: atticusHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →

What happened

Plaintiffs Rigoberto Sarmiento and Gustavo Luevano-Vaca filed a class action lawsuit against Fresh Harvest, Inc., Fresh Foods, Inc., SMD Logistics, Inc., and Rava Ranches, Inc. A settlement agreement has been proposed to resolve the claims.

Do you qualify?

<UNKNOWN>

How to file

<UNKNOWN>

Common questions

Is the Sarmiento v. Fresh Harvest notice real, or a scam?
Atticus Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at acuerdochoferes.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
When will payments from the Sarmiento v. Fresh Harvest be sent?
Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Fresh Harvest, Inc.,(Counter-Claimant)
  • Gustavo Luevano-Vaca
  • Rigoberto Sarmiento

Defendants

  • Rava Ranches, Inc.
  • SMD Logistics, Inc.
  • Fresh Foods, Inc.

Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.

New to class actions?

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More employment settlements

View all →
September 16, 2026employment

Perry v. Alatrade Foods WARN Act Settlement

Plaintiff alleges that Alatrade Foods violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide at least 60 days' advance notice before terminating employees due to a mass layoff or plant closing at its Phenix City, Alabama facility between February and August 2025. Alatrade denies all allegations and liability.

Back pay consisting of 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; exact amount depends on individual employment records

Deadline TBDemployment

Gilbert v AT&T Mobility Wage and Hour Class Action Settlement

AT&T Mobility Services LLC is accused of wage and hour violations against its non-exempt employees in California. Former and current employees filed a class action seeking back wages, unreimbursed business expenses, penalties, and other relief, plus penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) for the period September 21, 2022 to September 3, 2025.

Deadline TBDemployment

AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement

Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.

Deadline TBDemployment

Patrick Wilson v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company Employment Settlement

Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California labor laws by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company disputes the claims and denies any wrongdoing.

Payment based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025