Silvergate Bank FTX Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was January 30, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Silvergate Bank, Silvergate Capital Corporation, and Alan J. Lane allegedly aided and abetted tortious conduct by FTX, Alameda, and Sam Bankman-Fried. The defendants deny no wrongdoing is mentioned but agree to pay $10,000,000 to settle the lawsuit and avoid the costs and risks of continuing litigation.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who deposited fiat currency into an FTX- or Alameda-related account at Silvergate Bank between April 1, 2019, and November 11, 2022.
How to file
Submit a claim by January 30, 2026 on this website to receive payment. You will be bound by the settlement agreement.
Common questions
- How much does the Silvergate Bank FTX Settlement pay?
- The total settlement fund is $10M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Silvergate Bank FTX Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was January 30, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Silvergate Bank FTX Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at ftxbanksettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Silvergate Bank FTX Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for February 9, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
In the news
- Silvergate Bank lawsuit calls for FTX, Alameda clients to weigh in on $10M settlementCointelegraph · December 17, 2025
- Circle, Paxos, Bitstamp and Galaxy join Coinbase in scaling back partnerships with Silvergate BankCointelegraph · March 2, 2023
- Lawsuit Alleges Silvergate, CEO Were Aware Of Sam Bankman-Fried's Multibillion-Dollar Fraud SchemeInternational Business Times · February 16, 2023
- SBF and FTX fraud 'aided and abetted' by Silvergate Bank, alleges lawsuitBiztoc.com · February 15, 2023
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Bradberry v. Equifax Information Services LLC - Duplicate Collection Accounts Settlement
Equifax allegedly reported the same collection account more than once on consumer credit reports, which the lawsuit claims violates the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Equifax denies wrongdoing, and the parties agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Patton v Trinity Settlement
Trinity Operating (USG) LLC allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to oil and gas producers for production proceeds from Oklahoma wells, in violation of Oklahoma law. The defendant denies all wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs of continued litigation.
Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.