Walmart Check Policy Settlement
No monetary payments to class members
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Walmart and its check processor TeleCheck allegedly violated check processing disclosure requirements by not adequately informing customers that they could incur multiple bank fees for insufficient funds, causing class members to incur these fees. Under the proposed settlement, Walmart will update its check payment disclosures at all stores to warn customers of potential multiple bank fees.
Do you qualify?
Class members are customers who made check payments at Walmart and were subject to the allegedly inadequate check processing disclosures that failed to warn of potential multiple bank fees.
How to file
This settlement does not provide monetary payments to class members. Class members may object to the settlement by the April 23, 2026 deadline. Details on how to object are available in the FAQ tab on the settlement website.
Common questions
- How much does the Walmart Check Policy Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: No monetary payments to class members. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- Is the Walmart Check Policy Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at checkpolicysettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Walmart Check Policy Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for July 27, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Brandy Morris
Defendants
- Walmart Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Rewards Points Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full price of purchases before applying loyalty rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price after points were redeemed. The lawsuit claimed Schnucks illegally collected excess sales tax and failed to properly inform customers about this practice.
Up to $7
Dr. Squatch "Natural" Products Settlement
Dr. Squatch allegedly represented that its shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products were natural, even though they allegedly contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies these allegations and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid further litigation expenses and uncertainty, with no admission of wrongdoing by Dr. Squatch.
Pro rata payment based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the Settlement Class
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid
Kroger Rx Savings Club Settlement
Kroger allegedly failed to consider its Rx Savings Club or Health Savings Club prices when determining "usual and customary" (U&C) prices submitted for insurance claims. Plaintiffs contend Kroger should have used its lower Savings Club prices when calculating U&C prices, resulting in customers paying higher insurance copays. Kroger denies wrongdoing and maintains it correctly reported retail prices as U&C prices. The court has not decided the merits.
Payments calculated based on the amount a claimant paid for prescription drugs from Kroger where prescription insurance benefits were used.