Windy City Amusements H-2B Wage Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 5, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Defendants Windy City Amusements Inc., 2M Maintenance Inc., Mark Salerno, and Anthony Salerno allegedly failed to properly provide H-2B employees their wages for hours worked over forty hours in a workweek pursuant to Illinois law. The defendants have denied all allegations and that they acted wrongfully. In 2025, the parties agreed to settle to avoid the cost of trial and appeal.
Do you qualify?
All H-2B employees of Defendants Windy City Amusements Inc., 2M Maintenance Inc., Mark Salerno, or Anthony Salerno who worked at carnivals between January 27, 2015, and September 8, 2025.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form by the deadline of February 5, 2026. Visit www.windycityamusementssettlement.com for more information on how to file. The settlement administrator contact information and court documents are available on the website.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Windy City Amusements H-2B Wage Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 5, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Windy City Amusements H-2B Wage Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at windycityamusementssettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Windy City Amusements H-2B Wage Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
In the news
- Case Closed, Chicago Style: Jussie Smollett Makes $50K Charity Donation, Admits No Guilt In Hoax Hate Crime Attack SagaDeadline · May 23, 2025
- Jussie Smollett Paying $50K to Charity in Settlement With City of ChicagoTMZ · May 22, 2025
- Emergency Slide Falls From Plane And Lands In Chicago BackyardJalopnik · July 18, 2023
- Bears vs Texans Postgame | Bear With Me - Windy City GridironWindy City Gridiron · September 25, 2022
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Hill v. BrandSafway Services - Employment Application Settlement
BrandSafway Services and related companies allegedly failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information in their job postings for open positions in Washington. Defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.
Up to $1,632.11
Perry v. Alatrade Foods - WARN Act Settlement
Alatrade Foods terminated employees at its Phenix City, Alabama facility due to a mass layoff or plant closing between February and August 2025. The plaintiff alleges the company violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide the required 60 days' advance notice. Alatrade denies all allegations and claims affirmative defenses.
Back pay at 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; amount depends on individual wages earned during the termination period
Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement
Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.
From $685.87
Garner v. Amazon Retail LLC Settlement
Amazon Retail LLC allegedly violated Washington State wage and hour laws by failing to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods and pay all owed wages. The defendant has denied these allegations.