Abbott Laboratories Consumer Fraud Class Action
Last verified September 30, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-09452).
- December 26, 2024Case filed
What happened
This appears to be a proposed class action against Abbott Laboratories, apparently concerning fraud claims (Nature of Suit 370). The docket text does not provide specifics about the alleged conduct, and it later reflects a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. The allegations are not proven facts.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Abbott Laboratories Consumer Fraud Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed December 26, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-09452).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Abbott Laboratories Consumer Fraud Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Kiryl Karpiuk (Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.); Alan Gudino (Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.); Bahar Sodaify (Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.); Shireen M. Clarkson (Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.). For Abbott Laboratories: William J. Trach (Latham and Watkins LLP); Nathan A. Sandals (Latham & Watkins); Gwyn Williams (Latham & Watkins LLP); Melanie Marilyn Blunschi (Latham & Watkins LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Max Ulrich
- Ryan Schavrien
Defendants
- Abbott Laboratories
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Kiryl KarpiukClarkson Law Firm, P.C.Represents Ryan Schavrien, Max Ulrichkiryl@protectionlawgroup.com · (213) 788-4050
- Alan GudinoClarkson Law Firm, P.C.Represents Ryan Schavrien, Max Ulrich4 tracked casesagudino@clarksonlawfirm.com · (213) 788-4050
- Bahar SodaifyClarkson Law Firm, P.C.Represents Ryan Schavrien, Max Ulrich6 tracked casesbsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com · (213) 788-4050
- Shireen M. ClarksonClarkson Law Firm, P.C.Represents Ryan Schavrien, Max Ulrich4 tracked casessclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com · (213) 788-4050
- Benjamin J. FuchsLaw Office of Benjamin J. FuchsRepresents Ryan Schavrien, Max Ulrich3 tracked casesben@bjflegal.com · (510) 542-9201
Counsel for defendants
- William J. TrachLatham and Watkins LLPRepresents Abbott Laboratories2 tracked caseswilliam.trach@lw.com · (617) 948-6000
- Nathan A. SandalsLatham & WatkinsRepresents Abbott Laboratories3 tracked casesnathan.sandals@lw.com · (617) 948-6000
- Gwyn WilliamsLatham & Watkins LLPRepresents Abbott Laboratories2 tracked casesgwyn.williams@lw.com · (617) 880-4512
- Melanie Marilyn BlunschiLatham & Watkins LLPRepresents Abbott Laboratories16 tracked cases · $59.5M in disclosed settlements defendedmelanie.blunschi@lw.com · (415) 395-8129
Other cases these firms appear in
- Oura, Inc. Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- Adams v. Target Corporation Labor Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- Meta AI Glasses Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- 7TABZ Retail Fraud Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- Madhava Honey Consumer Fraud Class Action · Law Office of Benjamin J. Fuchs
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
- Who Gets the $384M Settlement from Abbott's Tainted Baby Formula?Biztoc.com · September 17, 2026
- Illinois Manufacturer Agrees to $384,999,040 Settlement Over Infant Formula False ClaimsThe Daily Hodl · September 17, 2026
- Abbott Agrees to Pay Nearly $385 Million to Settle Claims Over Infant Formula Made in Michigan and ArizonaMedical Daily · September 16, 2026
- Agrees To $385 Million Infant Formula Recall SettlementBiztoc.com · September 16, 2026
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Up to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted