Armstrong v. Credit Cube RICO Class Action
Last verified September 19, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, M.D. North Carolina (No. 1:25-cv-00916).
- October 9, 2025Case filed
What happened
This proposed class action against Credit Cube alleges racketeering or corrupt organization conduct under the RICO statute. Based solely on the docket caption and nature of suit, the specific allegations cannot be determined, but the case appears to involve potential wrongdoing by a financial services entity that may affect consumers or account holders.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Armstrong v. Credit Cube RICO Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed October 9, 2025 in the District Court, M.D. North Carolina (No. 1:25-cv-00916).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Armstrong v. Credit Cube RICO Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: SCOTT HARRIS (BRYSON HARRIS SUCIU & DEMAY, PLLC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- TERRELL ARMSTRONG
Defendants
- NORTH AMERICAN BANKING COMPANY
- BEN G. RAY , III
- CREDIT CUBE
Counsel for plaintiffs
- SCOTT HARRISBRYSON HARRIS SUCIU & DEMAY, PLLCRepresents TERRELL ARMSTRONG25 tracked cases · $34M in disclosed settlementssharris@brysonpllc.com · (919) 600-5000
Other cases these firms appear in
- Unison Home Equity Agreement Class Action · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
- Rioux v. IDscan.net Data Breach Class Action · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
- Sharecare Contract Class Action · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
- McCormick v. The Campbell's Company · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Each eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.