Barton v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, S.D. California (No. 3:25-cv-02833).
- October 22, 2025Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Colgate-Palmolive Company filed in federal court in Southern California. Without access to the complaint, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and docket information alone, though the case involves consumer or product-related claims based on the nature of suit code.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Barton v. Colgate-Palmolive Company case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed October 22, 2025 in the District Court, S.D. California (No. 3:25-cv-02833).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Barton v. Colgate-Palmolive Company?
- For the plaintiffs: Naomi B. Spector (KamberLaw LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Cynthia Fahrnkopf
- Nathan Barton
Defendants
- Colgate-Palmolive Company
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Naomi B. SpectorKamberLaw LLPRepresents Nathan Barton, Cynthia Fahrnkopf11 tracked casesnspector@kamberlaw.com · (310) 400-1053
Other cases these firms appear in
- Grimbaldeston v. Saraya USA, Inc. Fraud Class Action · KamberLaw LLP
- Olly Public Benefit Corporation Class Action · KamberLaw LLP
- McNatt v. Jocko Fuel Fraud Class Action · KamberLaw LLP
- Livingston v. Naked Whey Class Action · KamberLaw LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
- Judge hands defeat to Musk's X, throws out lawsuit accusing advertisters of illegal boycottCBC News · March 27, 2026
- Judge dismisses lawsuit by Musk's X Corp accusing advertisers of illegal boycottCNA · March 26, 2026
- Colgate-Palmolive reaches $332-million settlement with employees over pensionsBiztoc.com · September 2, 2025
- Musk adds Shell, Nestlé, Lego to X advertiser 'boycott' lawsuitBiztoc.com · February 3, 2025
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid