Champagne v. Seven-One-Seven Parking Services Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, M.D. Florida (No. 8:26-cv-00315).
- February 2, 2026Case filed
What happened
This proposed class action alleges claims against a parking services company under a statutory provision, though specific allegations are not available from the docket metadata. The case involves ordinary consumers who likely incurred parking-related charges or fees, and potentially involves unfair billing, improper charges, or other practices affecting parking customers.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Champagne v. Seven-One-Seven Parking Services Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed February 2, 2026 in the District Court, M.D. Florida (No. 8:26-cv-00315).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Champagne v. Seven-One-Seven Parking Services Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Charles Mark Garabedian (Mark Ferrer & Hayden). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Mark Champagne
Defendants
- Seven-One-Seven Parking Services, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Charles Mark GarabedianMark Ferrer & HaydenRepresents Mark Champagne3 tracked casescharles@markmigdal.com · (305) 374-6450
Other cases these firms appear in
- Vanguard Parking Solutions Parking Violation Class Action · Mark Ferrer & Hayden
- Levine v. Municipal Parking Services Class Action · Mark Ferrer & Hayden
- Highland Health Direct TCPA Class Action · Mark Ferrer & Hayden
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)