Levine v. Municipal Parking Services Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, M.D. Florida (No. 8:25-cv-02920).
- October 27, 2025Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Municipal Parking Services, Inc. has been filed in federal court in the Middle District of Florida. Based on the nature of suit code, the case apparently involves statutory claims against the parking services company, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption alone.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Levine v. Municipal Parking Services Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed October 27, 2025 in the District Court, M.D. Florida (No. 8:25-cv-02920).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Levine v. Municipal Parking Services Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Charles Mark Garabedian (Mark Ferrer & Hayden). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- STEVE LEVINE
Defendants
- MUNICIPAL PARKING SERVICES, INC.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Charles Mark GarabedianMark Ferrer & HaydenRepresents STEVE LEVINE3 tracked casescharles@markmigdal.com · (305) 374-6450
Other cases these firms appear in
- Champagne v. Seven-One-Seven Parking Services Class Action · Mark Ferrer & Hayden
- Vanguard Parking Solutions Parking Violation Class Action · Mark Ferrer & Hayden
- Highland Health Direct TCPA Class Action · Mark Ferrer & Hayden
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid