Health Matching Account Services Contract Class Action
Last verified October 2, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, S.D. Texas (No. 4:24-cv-04611).
- November 22, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against Health Matching Account Services, Inc., apparently concerning contract claims related to health matching account services. The docket text references an emergency motion by plaintiffs to appoint a receiver and a government motion to intervene and stay discovery, suggesting a dispute over funds or control. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Health Matching Account Services Contract Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed November 22, 2024 in the District Court, S.D. Texas (No. 4:24-cv-04611).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Health Matching Account Services Contract Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Carl Johnson (Loftus & Eisenberg, Ltd.); James O Crewse (Crewse Law Firm, PLLC); Alexander Nicholas Loftus (Loftus & Eisenberg, Ltd.). For Health Matching Account Services, Inc.: Christopher C. Pappas (Kane Russell Coleman Logan); David Russell Wortham , Jr (Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP); Amber Krupp (Warner Norcross Judd LLP); Alan Timothy Rogalski (Warner Norcross & Judd LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Robert Mainini
- Bobbie Pope
- Melanie Furniss
- Darian Woodbright
Defendants
- ClaimChoice Administrators, LLC(Respondent)
- Health Matching Account Services, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Carl JohnsonLoftus & Eisenberg, Ltd.Represents Darian Woodbright, Melanie Furniss, Bobbie Pope, Robert Maininicarl@loftusandeisenberg.com · (312) 319-8590
- James O CrewseCrewse Law Firm, PLLCRepresents Darian Woodbright, Melanie Furniss, Bobbie Pope, Robert Mainini2 tracked casesjcrewse@crewselawfirm.com · (214) 394-2856
- Alexander Nicholas LoftusLoftus & Eisenberg, Ltd.Represents Darian Woodbright, Melanie Furniss, Bobbie Pope, Robert Mainini3 tracked casesalex@loftusandeisenberg.com · (312) 899-6625
Counsel for defendants
- Christopher C. PappasKane Russell Coleman LoganRepresents Health Matching Account Services, Inc.cpappas@krcl.com · (713) 425-7401
- David Russell Wortham , JrHanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLPRepresents ClaimChoice Administrators, LLCdrw@hanshawkennedy.com · (972) 731-6500
- Amber KruppWarner Norcross Judd LLPRepresents ClaimChoice Administrators, LLCakrupp@wnj.com · (810) 210-0957
- Alan Timothy RogalskiWarner Norcross & Judd LLPRepresents ClaimChoice Administrators, LLCarogalski@wnj.com · (313) 546-6055
- Dennis Paul DuffyKane Russell Coleman LoganRepresents Health Matching Account Services, Inc.dduffy@krcl.com · (713) 425-7456
- Andrea Marie JohnsonKane Russell Coleman LoganRepresents Health Matching Account Services, Inc.ajohnson@krcl.com · (713) 425-7433
Other cases these firms appear in
- Collaku v. Pinnacle Bank Fraud Class Action · Loftus & Eisenberg, Ltd.
- Mainini v. Health Matching Account Services Class Action · Loftus & Eisenberg, Ltd.
- Berven v. Sturgis Hospital Class Action · Warner Norcross & Judd LLP
- Benefits Partner Class Action · Warner Norcross & Judd LLP
- UBP Bay City Contract Class Action · Warner Norcross & Judd LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Each eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.