Mannino v. Mattel Class Action
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
A proposed class action against Mattel Inc in federal court, though the specific allegations are not available in the provided docket information. Based on the nature of suit code and defendant, the lawsuit likely concerns a consumer product issue, but the precise claims cannot be determined without access to the complaint or initial docket entries.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Mannino v. Mattel Class Action case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the Mannino v. Mattel Class Action case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, C.D. California, case number 2:26-cv-08711. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Holsapple v. Reactor Inc. (Vertical Hold) Settlement
Vertical Hold Rock Climbing Gym allegedly excluded male and non-binary customers from paying for women's and ladies' clinics, classes, or events between 2017 and 2020. The defendants agreed to settle this class action lawsuit by providing compensation to eligible class members.
Four day passes to Vertical Hold
Calverton Park Vehicle Towing Settlement
The City of Calverton Park towed vehicles from private property and charged owners fines and fees, including special tax bills, alleging violations of a municipal nuisance ordinance. The defendants deny any wrongdoing or liability.
The amount of your payment will depend on whether you were able to recover your vehicle from the tow lot; the number of days your vehicle was impounded before release; and the total costs of fines and fees, including the Special Tax Bill, you paid to the City of Calverton Park or the tow lot.
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid
Gelasio v. Educative Subscription Auto-Renewal Settlement
Educative automatically renewed customers' annual and monthly digital subscription offerings and charged their payment methods without providing the required disclosures and authorizations under California law. Educative denies these claims, and the parties agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid further expense and litigation risk.
$11.93–$23.86