Marlene Crawford v. Hometap Equity Partners Home Equity Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 5:26-cv-03457).
- June 23, 2026Case filed
What happened
This proposed class action against Hometap Equity Partners, LLC concerns claims arising from the company's home equity product or service offerings. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations are unclear, but the case appears to involve ordinary homeowners as potential class members regarding home equity financing or related consumer financial services.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Marlene Crawford v. Hometap Equity Partners Home Equity Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed June 23, 2026 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 5:26-cv-03457).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Marlene Crawford v. Hometap Equity Partners Home Equity Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Cameron Ryan Partovi (Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.); Lauren K.W. Brennan (Francis Mailman Soumilas PC); James A. Francis (Francis Mailman Soumilas PC); Chimaraoke Iko (Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.). For Hometap Equity Partners, LLC: Anthony Q Le (McGuireWoods LLP); Kristopher Issac deVyver (McGuireWoods LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Michael Saunders
- Marlene Crawford
Defendants
- Hometap Investment Partners II, L.P.
- Hometap Equity Partners, LLC
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Cameron Ryan PartoviClarkson Law Firm, P.C.Represents Marlene Crawford, Michael Saunderscpartovi@clarksonlawfirm.com · (213) 788-4050
- Lauren K.W. BrennanFrancis Mailman Soumilas PCRepresents Marlene Crawford7 tracked cases · $117.5M in disclosed settlementslbrennan@consumerlawfirm.com · (215) 735-8600
- James A. FrancisFrancis Mailman Soumilas PCRepresents Marlene Crawford23 tracked cases · $167.8M in disclosed settlementsjfrancis@consumerlawfirm.com · (215) 735-8600
- Chimaraoke IkoClarkson Law Firm, P.C.Represents Marlene Crawfordriko@clarksonlawfirm.com · (213) 788-4050
- Kristen Marie Gelinas SimplicioClarkson Law FirmRepresents Marlene Crawford, Michael Saunders8 tracked cases · $20M in disclosed settlementsksimplicio@clarksonlawfirm.com · (202) 998-2299
Counsel for defendants
- Anthony Q LeMcGuireWoods LLPRepresents Hometap Equity Partners, LLC, Hometap Investment Partners II, L.P.3 tracked cases · $33M in disclosed settlements defendedale@mcguirewoods.com · (310) 315-8200
- Kristopher Issac deVyverMcGuireWoods LLPRepresents Hometap Equity Partners, LLC, Hometap Investment Partners II, L.P.2 tracked caseskdevyver@mcguirewoods.com · (412) 667-7988
Other cases these firms appear in
- Oura, Inc. Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- Adams v. Target Corporation Labor Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- Meta AI Glasses Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- 7TABZ Retail Fraud Class Action · Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- Cleara Statutory Class Action · Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C.
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)