CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetother

Massage Envy Consumer Class Action

Last verified October 9, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 4:24-cv-05585).

  1. August 21, 2024
    Case filed

What happened

A proposed class action was filed against Massage Envy Franchising, LLC in the Northern District of California. The nature of suit is listed as 'Other Statutory Actions,' but the docket text does not detail the specific allegations. Based on the defendant and case type, the lawsuit appears to concern consumer-related statutory claims, though no specific conduct can be confirmed from the available information.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Massage Envy Consumer Class Action case?
No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed August 21, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 4:24-cv-05585).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the Massage Envy Consumer Class Action?
For the plaintiffs: Isam Charles Khoury (Cohelan Khoury & Singer); Michael David Singer (Cohelan Khoury & Singer); Maggie Realin (Cohelan Khoury & Singer); Rosemary C Khoury (Cohelan Khoury and Singer). For Massage Envy Franchising, LLC: Michael Tedder Scott (Sacks & Scott); Kahn Abrahm Scolnick (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP); Alisha Mahalingam (Gibson Dunn); Luanne Sacks (Sacks & Scott). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Valencia Jefferson
  • Daniel Grosso

Defendants

  • Massage Envy, LLC
  • Massage Envy Clinic Operations, LLC
  • ME SPE HOLDCO, LLC
  • ME Funding, LLC
  • ME Holding Corporation
  • Massage Envy FLW, LLC
  • ME SPE Franchising, LLC
  • Massage Envy Franchising, LLC

Counsel for plaintiffs

Counsel for defendants

  • Michael Tedder ScottSacks & Scott
    Represents Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, ME SPE Franchising, LLC, Massage Envy FLW, LLC, ME Holding Corporation, ME Funding, LLC, ME SPE HOLDCO, LLC, Massage Envy Clinic Operations, LLC, Massage Envy, LLC
    mscott@sacksandscott.com · (415) 298-4539
  • Kahn Abrahm ScolnickGibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP
    Represents Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, ME SPE Franchising, LLC, Massage Envy FLW, LLC, ME Holding Corporation, ME Funding, LLC, ME SPE HOLDCO, LLC, Massage Envy Clinic Operations, LLC, Massage Envy, LLC
    3 tracked cases
    kscolnick@gibsondunn.com · (213) 229-7656
  • Alisha MahalingamGibson Dunn
    Represents Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, ME SPE Franchising, LLC, Massage Envy FLW, LLC, ME Holding Corporation, ME Funding, LLC, ME SPE HOLDCO, LLC, Massage Envy Clinic Operations, LLC, Massage Envy, LLC
    agill@gibsondunn.com · (213) 229-7696
  • Luanne SacksSacks & Scott
    Represents Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, ME SPE Franchising, LLC, Massage Envy FLW, LLC, ME Holding Corporation, ME Funding, LLC, ME SPE HOLDCO, LLC, Massage Envy Clinic Operations, LLC, Massage Envy, LLC
    lsacks@sacksandscott.com · (415) 518-3391

Other cases these firms appear in

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More other settlements

View all →
November 2, 2026No proof neededother

Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detainment Settlement

From $685.87

November 3, 2026other

Limetree Bay Refinery Incidents Settlement

Payments will be calculated using a pro rata point system encompassing property damage, nuisance, trespass, economic losses, cistern related physical impact, physical and emotional health manifestations, and non-reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses incurred that arose from the Limetree Bay Refinery release incidents.

December 3, 2026other

SPS Technologies Fire Settlement

Up to $5,300

November 18, 2069No proof neededother

NCAA Concussion Settlement Medical Monitoring Program

Free medical screening and free medical evaluations up to two times