Miguel Esparza v. Freedom Laser Therapy Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 8:25-cv-02053).
- September 10, 2025Case filed
What happened
This proposed class action alleges claims against Freedom Laser Therapy, Inc., a company that apparently provides laser therapy services or products. While the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket materials, the case is brought on behalf of a putative class that may include customers or patients who received services or purchased products from the defendant.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Miguel Esparza v. Freedom Laser Therapy Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed September 10, 2025 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 8:25-cv-02053).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Miguel Esparza v. Freedom Laser Therapy Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Scott J Ferrell (Pacific Trial Attorneys APC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Miguel Esparza, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendants
- Freedom Laser Therapy, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Scott J FerrellPacific Trial Attorneys APCRepresents Miguel Esparza, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated53 tracked casessferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com · (949) 706-6464
Other cases these firms appear in
- Pettiford v. Gerber Life Insurance Company · Pacific Trial Attorneys APC
- Oh v. Healthcare, Inc. Class Action · Pacific Trial Attorneys APC
- Licea v. Laird Superfood Class Action · Pacific Trial Attorneys APC
- Rodriguez v. Wantable Consumer Class Action · Pacific Trial Attorneys APC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid