Miller v. InDebted USA Consumer Credit Class Action
Last verified August 8, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, W.D. Wisconsin (No. 3:26-cv-00728).
- August 7, 2026Case filed
What happened
This proposed class action alleges consumer credit-related claims against InDebted USA, Inc. The case was filed in federal court under the consumer credit classification, suggesting the lawsuit concerns debt collection, lending practices, or related consumer financial transactions. Specific allegations are not available from the docket information provided.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Miller v. InDebted USA Consumer Credit Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed August 7, 2026 in the District Court, W.D. Wisconsin (No. 3:26-cv-00728).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Miller v. InDebted USA Consumer Credit Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Leanna Alexis Loginov (Shamis & Gentile, P.A.). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Salem Miller
Defendants
- InDebted USA, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Leanna Alexis LoginovShamis & Gentile, P.A.Represents Salem Miller92 tracked cases · $2.1M in disclosed settlementslloginov@shamisgentile.com · (917) 628-5842
Other cases these firms appear in
- ZIZZL Contract Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
- Kovo+ and St. Louis Behavioral Medicine Institute Contract Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
- Quest Healthcare Solutions Contract Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
- Bassett Healthcare Network Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Each eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.