Can I file a claim in the MRO Corporation Class Action case?

No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed July 12, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio (No. 1:24-cv-01183).

Who are the attorneys in the MRO Corporation Class Action?

For the plaintiffs: Patrick J. Perotti (Dworken & Bernstein - Painesville); Frank A. Bartela (Dworken & Bernstein - Painesville). For MRO Corporation: Michael J. Zbiegien , Jr. (Taft Stettinius & Hollister - Cleveland); Daniel H. Bryan (Taft Stettinius & Hollister - Cleveland). From the public court docket.

In litigation — no settlement yetother

MRO Corporation Class Action

Last verified October 12, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, N.D. Ohio (No. 1:24-cv-01183).

July 12, 2024
Case filed

What happened

A proposed class action against MRO Corporation, apparently concerning personal property claims. The available caption and docket metadata do not detail the specific allegations.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the MRO Corporation Class Action case?: No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed July 12, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio (No. 1:24-cv-01183).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the MRO Corporation Class Action?: For the plaintiffs: Patrick J. Perotti (Dworken & Bernstein - Painesville); Frank A. Bartela (Dworken & Bernstein - Painesville). For MRO Corporation: Michael J. Zbiegien , Jr. (Taft Stettinius & Hollister - Cleveland); Daniel H. Bryan (Taft Stettinius & Hollister - Cleveland). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

Wendy Hudson-Swoope

Defendants

Cleveland Clinic Foundation
MRO Corporation

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership works Your options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

Filed: July 12, 2024
Case: Hudson-Swoope v. MRO Corporation
Case number: 1:24-cv-01183
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio

Case status & court docket

Most recent filing March 25, 2025

Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS the motion to stay pending arbitration (ECF No. 12 ), ORDERS Plaintiff and MRO to commence arbitration forthwith, STAYS this action pending arbitration, DENIES Defendants motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (ECF No. 12 ; ECF No. 11 ), and ORDERS MRO to

Federal court in OhioMore from Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio

In litigation · filed July 12, 2024

No approval milestones on the docket yet.

View the full court docket on CourtListener →

More other settlements

View all →

November 2, 2026No proof neededother

Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detainment Settlement

From $685.87

November 3, 2026other

Limetree Bay Refinery Incidents Settlement

Payments will be calculated using a pro rata point system encompassing property damage, nuisance, trespass, economic losses, cistern related physical impact, physical and emotional health manifestations, and non-reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses incurred that arose from the Limetree Bay Refinery release incidents.

December 3, 2026other