Purism Consumer Contract Class Action
Last verified September 30, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-09002).
- December 12, 2024Case filed
What happened
This appears to be a proposed class action against Purism, SPC. Based on the nature of suit (Contract: Other) and the defendant's consumer electronics business, it likely involves claims by purchasers of Purism products, though the docket text does not describe specific allegations. The case is in discovery, and the allegations are not proven.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Purism Consumer Contract Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed December 12, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-09002).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Purism Consumer Contract Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Dhaivat H Shah (Grellas Shah LLP); Erin M Adrian (Nixon Peabody LLP); David Ira Tobias Siegel (Grellas Shah LLP). For Purism, SPC: Thomas F Nowland (Law Offices of Thomas F. Nowland); Kevin H Ngai (Law Offices of Thomas F. Nowland); Daniel A Brodnax (Law Offices of Thomas F. Nowland). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Travis Deitz
- Matthew Thier
Defendants
- Purism, SPC
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Dhaivat H ShahGrellas Shah LLPRepresents Matthew Thier, Travis Deitzds@grellas.com · (408) 255-6310
- Erin M AdrianNixon Peabody LLPRepresents Matthew Thier, Travis Deitzema@grellas.com · (415) 984-8200
- David Ira Tobias SiegelGrellas Shah LLPRepresents Travis Deitz, Matthew Thierdsiegel@grellas.com · (408) 255-6310
Counsel for defendants
- Thomas F NowlandLaw Offices of Thomas F. NowlandRepresents Purism, SPCtom@nowlandlaw.com · (949) 221-0005
- Kevin H NgaiLaw Offices of Thomas F. NowlandRepresents Purism, SPCkevinhngai@gmail.com · (949) 221-0005
- Daniel A BrodnaxLaw Offices of Thomas F. NowlandRepresents Purism, SPCdbrodnax@nowlandlaw.com · (949) 221-0005
Other cases these firms appear in
- Luna Innovations Incorporated Securities Litigation Settlement · Grellas Shah LLP
- Grimbaldeston v. Saraya USA, Inc. Fraud Class Action · Nixon Peabody LLP
- Geagley v. TomoCredit Fraud Class Action · Nixon Peabody LLP
- Boyd v. The Boston Beer Company Class Action · Nixon Peabody LLP
- Ramirez v. S. Martinelli & Company · Nixon Peabody LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Up to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted