Universal Beauty Products Fraud Class Action
Verified October 15, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-05200).
- June 20, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Universal Beauty Products, Inc., apparently alleging fraud under the 'Other Fraud' nature-of-suit category. The docket indicates plaintiff Michael Dilanyan brought individual and putative class claims, which were later dismissed by the court—individual claims with prejudice and class claims without prejudice. The specific allegations are not detailed in the provided text, but the case appears to concern deceptive or fraudulent conduct related to consumer products.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Universal Beauty Products Fraud Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed June 20, 2024 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:24-cv-05200).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Universal Beauty Products Fraud Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Erik Pogosyan (Malk and Pogo Law Group, LLP); Valter Malkhasyan (Malk Pogo Law Group, LLP). For Universal Beauty Products, Inc.: Grant A. Nigolian (Grant Nigolian PC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Michael Dilanyan
Defendants
- Universal Beauty Products, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Erik PogosyanMalk and Pogo Law Group, LLPRepresents Michael Dilanyan7 tracked caseserik@malkpogolaw.com · (818) 484-5204
- Valter MalkhasyanMalk Pogo Law Group, LLPRepresents Michael Dilanyan6 tracked casesvalter@malkpogolaw.com · (818) 351-6611
Counsel for defendants
- Grant A. NigolianGrant Nigolian PCRepresents Universal Beauty Products, Inc.grant@gnpclaw.com · (310) 853-2777
Other cases these firms appear in
- Hook v. Unilever United States · Malk and Pogo Law Group, LLP
- Vales v. Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmetique USA - Consumer Fraud Class Action · Malk and Pogo Law Group, LLP
- Norman v. Apple Inc. · Malk and Pogo Law Group, LLP
- Lauren Norman v. Apple Inc. · Malk and Pogo Law Group, LLP
- Valadez v. WK Kellogg Co. Fraud Class Action · Malk Pogo Law Group, LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Up to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted