Vickery v. Albert Corporation Truth in Lending Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:26-cv-06492).
- June 15, 2026Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Albert Corporation under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), apparently concerning alleged lending or credit practices that may violate federal truth-in-lending requirements. The case was recently filed in federal court and is in its early procedural stages.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Vickery v. Albert Corporation Truth in Lending Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed June 15, 2026 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:26-cv-06492).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Vickery v. Albert Corporation Truth in Lending Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Bartholomew Philip Dalton (Brozynski and Dalton PC); Joseph Henry Bates , III (Carney Bates and Pulliam, PLLC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Samuel Vickery
Defendants
- Albert Cash, LLC
- Albert Corporation
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Bartholomew Philip DaltonBrozynski and Dalton PCRepresents Samuel Vickery2 tracked casesbart@bdlegalgroup.com · (972) 371-0679
- Joseph Henry Bates , IIICarney Bates and Pulliam, PLLCRepresents Samuel Vickery19 tracked cases · $22.3M in disclosed settlementshbates@cbplaw.com · (501) 312-8500
Other cases these firms appear in
- Wren v. FreshRealm Product Liability Class Action · Brozynski & Dalton PC
- Delta Dental of California Anti-Trust Class Action · Carney Bates & Pulliam, PLLC
- Gonzalez v. Uniti Services LLC · Carney Bates & Pulliam, PLLC
- Windstream Holdings Consumer Class Action · Carney Bates & Pulliam, PLLC
- Penning v. Newsmax Media Class Action · Carney Bates & Pulliam, PLLC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
- Iko Uwais and Albert Hughes Team Up for Multi-Generational Crime Series JAKARTAGeekTyrant · July 30, 2026
- Diddy & Snoop Dogg Sued Over Songs Released 20 Years Ago!Mediatakeout.com · July 17, 2026
- RSU 73 board hears gender lawsuit update, learns about possible delay in rulingBiztoc.com · June 26, 2026
- Eintracht Frankfurt brings back Adi Hütter as coach on a 3-year dealYahoo Entertainment · May 31, 2026
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)