EEOC v. Security Engineers Sex Discrimination Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 27, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The EEOC alleged that Security Engineers, Inc. discriminated against female applicants for security officer positions at locations throughout Alabama based on their sex from March 1, 2017, to March 10, 2025. The company has resolved the lawsuit.
Do you qualify?
Female individuals who applied for a security officer position with Security Engineers in Alabama between March 1, 2017, and March 10, 2025, but were not hired.
How to file
Complete and submit the Questionnaire available on this website by February 27, 2026. The questionnaire will confirm your eligibility and allow you to claim monetary relief.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the EEOC v. Security Engineers Sex Discrimination Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 27, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the EEOC v. Security Engineers Sex Discrimination Settlement?
- Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
- Is the EEOC v. Security Engineers Sex Discrimination Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at securityengineerssettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the EEOC v. Security Engineers Sex Discrimination Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
In the news
- IT certifications for cloud architects, data security engineers, and ethical hackers yield the biggest pay boostsComputerworld · November 7, 2024
- These 19 companies have the most open cybersecurity roles amid surging threats and a nationwide talent gapBusiness Insider · June 4, 2021
- Twilio salaries revealed: Here's how much engineers, product managers, and more make at the $48 billion cloud communications company that's skyrocketed amid the pandemic (TWLO)Business Insider · October 18, 2020
- Securing work-at-home appsSecurity Boulevard · May 19, 2020
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Hill v. BrandSafway Services - Employment Application Settlement
BrandSafway Services and related companies allegedly failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information in their job postings for open positions in Washington. Defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.
Up to $1,632.11
Perry v. Alatrade Foods - WARN Act Settlement
Alatrade Foods terminated employees at its Phenix City, Alabama facility due to a mass layoff or plant closing between February and August 2025. The plaintiff alleges the company violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide the required 60 days' advance notice. Alatrade denies all allegations and claims affirmative defenses.
Back pay at 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; amount depends on individual wages earned during the termination period
Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement
Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.
From $685.87
Garner v. Amazon Retail LLC Settlement
Amazon Retail LLC allegedly violated Washington State wage and hour laws by failing to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods and pay all owed wages. The defendant has denied these allegations.