Do I need proof of purchase for the EEOC v AMTCR (McDonald's) Settlement?

Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.

Is the EEOC v AMTCR (McDonald's) Settlement notice real, or a scam?

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at amtcr-settlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.

When will payments from the EEOC v AMTCR (McDonald's) Settlement be sent?

Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for January 5, 2023; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.

Claims closedemployment

EEOC v AMTCR (McDonald's) Settlement

Last verified August 20, 2026Source: atticusHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →

What happened

The EEOC alleged that AMTCR Companies, which operate approximately 21 McDonald's restaurants in Nevada, Arizona, and California, engaged in unlawful employment practices by subjecting certain employees to sexual harassment and/or a sexually hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The AMTCR Companies agreed to settle the case with a Consent Decree approved by the court on January 5, 2023.

Do you qualify?

Current or former employees of AMTCR Inc., AMTCR Nevada LLC, AMTCR California LLC, White Bluff Inc., Gamble Oak Inc., or Rock Basin LLC at any time between January 1, 2017 and January 5, 2023 who were subjected to sexual harassment and/or a sexually hostile work environment, as determined in the EEOC's sole discretion.

How to file

Eligible claimants must sign and return an IRS Form W-9 to be considered for a payment from the settlement fund. The EEOC will determine eligibility based on whether the claimant was employed during the class period and could assert a viable claim for sexual harassment or a sexually hostile work environment.

Common questions

Do I need proof of purchase for the EEOC v AMTCR (McDonald's) Settlement?: Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
Is the EEOC v AMTCR (McDonald's) Settlement notice real, or a scam?: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at amtcr-settlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
When will payments from the EEOC v AMTCR (McDonald's) Settlement be sent?: Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for January 5, 2023; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Defendants

AMTCR California, LLC
AMTCR Nevada, Inc.
AMTCR, Inc.

Counsel for plaintiffs

Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.

New to class actions?

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

Proof required: Yes
Class period: January 1, 2017 – January 5, 2023
Final hearing: January 5, 2023
Case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v AMTCR, Inc., et al.
Case number: 2:21-CV-01808-JAD (NJK)
Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada
Administrator: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Official settlement website →

Case status & court docket

Federal court in Nevada

United States District Court, District of Nevada

Case terminated January 5, 2023

November 19, 2025
Distribution to class
ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Connie Liem and Maurice Aaron Neishlos withdrawn from the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/19/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)
January 5, 2023
Distribution to class
ORDER granting 14 Stipulated/Consent Judgment; The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/5/2023.; Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
February 9, 2022
Distribution to class
ORDER Staying case until 4/18/2022. Joint Status Report due by 4/8/2022. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/9/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

View the full court docket on CourtListener →

More employment settlements

View all →

September 16, 2026employment

Perry v. Alatrade Foods WARN Act Settlement

Plaintiff alleges that Alatrade Foods violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide at least 60 days' advance notice before a mass layoff or plant closing at its Phenix City, Alabama facility between February and August 2025. Alatrade denies all allegations and maintains it did not violate the WARN Act.

Payments to settlement class members will be made as back pay consisting of 100% wages with standard payroll taxes withheld

Deadline TBDemployment

Rad v. SkinSpirit Essential Settlement

SkinSpirit Essential, an employer in California, allegedly violated wage and hour laws by misclassifying employees and failing to pay required wages to non-exempt employees. The settlement includes both individual wage payments to class members and penalties under California's Private Attorney General Act.

Deadline TBDemployment

AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement

Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.

Deadline TBDemployment

PacBell Settlement

Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California labor laws by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline, in violation of Labor Code sections 233, 234, and 246.5. The company allegedly committed unfair business practices and is liable for civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Defendant denies all allegations.

A sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025