Hernandez v. Wakefield and Associates and Inphynet Contracting Medical Debt Collection Settlement
Last verified August 21, 2026Source: atticusHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Wakefield & Associates, LLC sent collection letters to Florida consumers regarding past due medical debt owed to Inphynet Contracting Services, LLC, seeking additional interest charges that exceeded the principal balance.
Do you qualify?
All consumers residing in the State of Florida who were mailed at least one collection letter from Wakefield & Associates, LLC regarding a past due medical debt owed to Inphynet Contracting Services, LLC, between approximately two years before the filing of the operative complaint and September 19, 2024.
How to file
Visit the settlement website to read the Long Form Notice and Settlement Documents for detailed information on how to file a claim. Specific claim filing instructions and deadlines are not provided on this page.
Common questions
- Is the Hernandez v. Wakefield and Associates and Inphynet Contracting Medical Debt Collection Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Atticus Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at hernandezclassaction.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Hernandez v. Wakefield and Associates and Inphynet Contracting Medical Debt Collection Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Cesar Hernandez
Defendants
- Inphynet Contracting Services, LLC
- Wakefield & Associates, LLC
Counsel for plaintiffs
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Patton v Trinity Settlement - Oil & Gas Royalty Payments
Trinity Operating (USG) LLC allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to oil and gas producers for production proceeds from Oklahoma wells. Trinity denies wrongdoing but agreed to the proposed settlement to avoid the costs and uncertainty of continued litigation.
Schnucks Markets Rewards Points Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full price of purchases before applying loyalty rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price after points were redeemed. The lawsuit claimed Schnucks illegally collected excess sales tax and failed to properly inform customers about this practice.
Up to $7
Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Kroger Rx Savings Club Settlement
Kroger allegedly failed to consider its Rx Savings Club or Health Savings Club prices when determining "usual and customary" (U&C) prices submitted for insurance claims. Plaintiffs contend Kroger should have used its lower Savings Club prices when calculating U&C prices, resulting in customers paying higher insurance copays. Kroger denies wrongdoing and maintains it correctly reported retail prices as U&C prices. The court has not decided the merits.
Payments calculated based on the amount a claimant paid for prescription drugs from Kroger where prescription insurance benefits were used.