Pentegra 401(k) Settlement
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was November 16, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Participants in the Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions have filed a class action lawsuit against the Board of Directors. The settlement resolves claims related to the plan's administration, though specific allegations are not detailed on this page.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who has been a participant or beneficiary in the Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions from September 15, 2014 through April 30, 2025.
How to file
Former Participants must file a Former Participant Claim Form that is postmarked or electronically filed by November 16, 2025. Current Participants do not need to take any action to participate in the settlement.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Pentegra 401(k) Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was November 16, 2025. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Pentegra 401(k) Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at pentegra401ksettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Pentegra 401(k) Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for December 2, 2025; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Chrystal Lewis(Consolidated Plaintiff)
- Lindsey Clark(Consolidated Plaintiff)
- Gregory S. Digsby(Consolidated Plaintiff)
- Richard Greenberg(Consolidated Plaintiff)
- Pamela Joy Wood
- Joan Bullock
- Imran Khan
Defendants
- John Does 1-20(Consolidated Defendant)
- The Board of Directors of the Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions(Consolidated Defendant)
- John Does 1-12
- George W. Hermann
- Brad Elliott
- William E. Hawkins, Jr.
- Michael N. Lussier
- Lisa A. Schlehuber
+ 4 more
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Nathan StumpSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Heather LeaSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Sean E SoyarsSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Scott A. BumbSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Sarah Adams
- Gabrielle KelerchianShook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
- Mark K. GyandohCapozzi Adler
- Donald R. ReaveyCapozzi & Associates, P.C.
- Andrew Dickens SchlichterSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Troy A. DolesSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Kurt C. StruckhoffSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Alexander L. BraitbergSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Jerome J SchlichterSchlichter Bogard LLC
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more